ADESSE: Advice Explanations in Complex Repeated Decision-Making Environments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the evolving landscape of human-centered AI, fostering a synergistic relationship between humans and AI agents in decision-making processes stands as a paramount challenge. This work considers a problem setup where an intelligent agent comprising a neural network-based prediction component and a deep reinforcement learning component provides advice to a human decision-maker in complex repeated decision-making environments. Whether the human decision-maker would follow the agent's advice depends on their beliefs and trust in the agent and on their understanding of the advice itself. To this end, we developed an approach named ADESSE to generate explanations about the adviser agent to improve human trust and decision-making. Computational experiments on a range of environments with varying model sizes demonstrate the applicability and scalability of ADESSE. Furthermore, an interactive game-based user study shows that participants were significantly more satisfied, achieved a higher reward in the game, and took less time to select an action when presented with explanations generated by ADESSE. These findings illuminate the critical role of tailored, human-centered explanations in AI-assisted decision-making.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2024.
Builds on
26 of 42 references.
References · 26
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
- 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
- 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
- 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 257
- 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
- 2020Explainable Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 139
- 2021Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunitiescited by 125
- 2020Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
- 2020The Emerging Landscape of Explainable AI Planning and Decision Makingcited by 44
- 2019Generation of Policy-Level Explanations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
14 more
- 2021Do Humans Trust Advice More if it Comes from AI? An Analysis of Human-AI Interactionscited by 35
- 2023Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning: State of the Art and Challengescited by 33
- 2020Bridging the Gap: Providing Post-Hoc Symbolic Explanations for Sequential Decision-Making Problems with Inscrutable Representationscited by 32
- 2020Local and Global Explanations of Agent Behavior: Integrating Strategy Summaries with Saliency Mapscited by 30
- 2022Personalized Showcases: Generating Multi-Modal Explanations for Recommendationscited by 30
- 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning for Safer Blood Glucose Control in People with Type 1 Diabetescited by 22
- 2020A Distributed Model-Free Ride-Sharing Approach for Joint Matching, Pricing, and Dispatching using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
- 2018Distributed Wildfire Surveillance with Autonomous Aircraft using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2019Active Goal Recognitioncited by 16
- 2019AI for Explaining Decisions in Multi-Agent Environmentscited by 12
- 2022Toward Policy Explanations for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2022Explainable Reinforcement Learning via Model Transformscited by 11
- 2023Explainable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Temporal Queriescited by 9
- 2023Explainable Goal Recognition: A Framework Based on Weight of Evidencecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.