mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Distributed Model-Free Ride-Sharing Approach for Joint Matching, Pricing, and Dispatching using Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2010.01755 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2020cs.MA cs.AI cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Significant development of ride-sharing services presents a plethora of opportunities to transform urban mobility by providing personalized and convenient transportation while ensuring efficiency of large-scale ride pooling. However, a core problem for such services is route planning for each driver to fulfill the dynamically arriving requests while satisfying given constraints. Current models are mostly limited to static routes with only two rides per vehicle (optimally) or three (with heuristics). In this paper, we present a dynamic, demand aware, and pricing-based vehicle-passenger matching and route planning framework that (1) dynamically generates optimal routes for each vehicle based on online demand, pricing associated with each ride, vehicle capacities and locations. This matching algorithm starts greedily and optimizes over time using an insertion operation, (2) involves drivers in the decision-making process by allowing them to propose a different price based on the expected reward for a particular ride as well as the destination locations for future rides, which is influenced by supply-and demand computed by the Deep Q-network, (3) allows customers to accept or reject rides based on their set of preferences with respect to pricing and delay windows, vehicle type and carpooling preferences, and (4) based on demand prediction, our approach re-balances idle vehicles by dispatching them to the areas of anticipated high demand using deep Reinforcement Learning (RL). Our framework is validated using the New York City Taxi public dataset; however, we consider different vehicle types and designed customer utility functions to validate the setup and study different settings. Experimental results show the effectiveness of our approach in real-time and large scale settings.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Reinforcement Learning for Ridesharing: An Extended Surveycited by 35
  2. 2023Improved Communication Efficiency in Federated Natural Policy Gradient via ADMM-based Gradient Updatescited by 21
  3. 2024Asynchronous Federated Reinforcement Learning with Policy Gradient Updates: Algorithm Design and Convergence Analysiscited by 21
  4. 2025Global Convergence for Average Reward Constrained MDPs with Primal-Dual Actor Critic Algorithmcited by 8
  5. 2024Stochastic Q-learning for Large Discrete Action Spacescited by 5
  6. 2021AdaPool: A Diurnal-Adaptive Fleet Management Framework using Model-Free Deep Reinforcement Learning and Change Point Detectioncited by 4
  7. 2025Triple-BERT: Do We Really Need MARL for Order Dispatch on Ride-Sharing Platforms?cited by 4
  8. 2023A Survey of Machine Learning-Based Ride-Hailing Planningcited by 3
  9. 2024ADESSE: Advice Explanations in Complex Repeated Decision-Making Environmentscited by 3
  10. 2025Coordinating Ride-Pooling with Public Transit using Reward-Guided Conservative Q-Learning: An Offline Training and Online Fine-Tuning Reinforcement Learning Frameworkcited by 3
  11. 2021DROP: Deep relocating option policy for optimal ride-hailing vehicle repositioningcited by 1
  12. 2022An Explainable Stacked Ensemble Model for Static Route-Free Estimation of Time of Arrivalcited by 1
5 more
  1. 2023Dynamic Adjustment of Matching Radii under the Broadcasting Mode: A Novel Multitask Learning Strategy and Temporal Modeling Approachcited by 0
  2. 2024A Survey on Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Spatial Resource Allocationcited by 0
  3. 2025Joint Matching and Pricing for Crowd-shipping with In-store Customerscited by 0
  4. 2025Altruistic Ride Sharing: A Framework for Fair and Sustainable Urban Mobility via Peer-to-Peer Incentivescited by 0
  5. 2026Hierarchical Multilevel Monte Carlo for Order-Optimal Neural Actor-Critic in Average-Reward CMDPscited by 0