mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SSFF: Investigating LLM Predictive Capabilities for Startup Success through a Multi-Agent Framework with Enhanced Explainability and Performance

arXiv 2405.19456 ↗First posted 29 May 2024cs.AIcited by 7

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM based agents have recently demonstrated strong potential in automating complex tasks, yet accurately predicting startup success remains an open challenge with few benchmarks and tailored frameworks. To address these limitations, we propose the Startup Success Forecasting Framework, an autonomous system that emulates the reasoning of venture capital analysts through a multi agent collaboration model. Our framework integrates traditional machine learning methods such as random forests and neural networks within a retrieval augmented generation framework composed of three interconnected modules: a prediction block, an analysis block, and an external knowledge block. We evaluate our framework and identify three main findings. First, by leveraging founder segmentation, startups led by L5 founders are 3.79 times more likely to succeed than those led by L1 founders. Second, baseline large language models consistently overpredict startup success and struggle under realistic class imbalances largely due to overreliance on founder claims. Third, our framework significantly enhances prediction accuracy, yielding a 108.3 percent relative improvement over GPT 4o mini and a 30.8 percent relative improvement over GPT 4o. These results demonstrate the value of a multi agent approach combined with discriminative machine learning in mitigating the limitations of standard large language model based prediction methods.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.

Builds on

10 of 58 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
  5. 2023Role-Play with Large Language Modelscited by 290
  6. 2024Agent AI: Surveying the Horizons of Multimodal Interactioncited by 167
  7. 2022QUILL: Query Intent with Large Language Models using Retrieval Augmentation and Multi-stage Distillationcited by 21
  8. 2023Founder-GPT: Self-play to evaluate the Founder-Idea fitcited by 6
  9. 2023Improving Startup Success with Text Analysiscited by 4
  10. 2023Startup success prediction and VC portfolio simulation using CrunchBase datacited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LLM-AR: LLM-powered Automated Reasoning Framework
  2. 2025CrunchLLM: Multitask LLMs for Structured Business Reasoning and Outcome Prediction
  3. 2026DIALECTIC: A Multi-Agent System for Startup Evaluation
  4. 2026StartupBench: Benchmarking General-Purpose Agents on Market-Validated End-to-End Workflows
  5. 2025PartnerMAS: An LLM Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Business Partner Selection on High-Dimensional Features
  6. 2026EnterpriseBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Enterprise-Level Strategic Reasoning and Decision-Making
  7. 2025Benchmarking LLM Agents for Wealth-Management Workflows
  8. 2026A Multi-Agent Orchestration Framework for Venture Capital Due Diligence