Reasoning-Based AI for Startup Evaluation (R.A.I.S.E.): A Memory-Augmented, Multi-Step Decision Framework
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a novel framework that bridges the gap between the interpretability of decision trees and the advanced reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to predict startup success. Our approach leverages chain-of-thought prompting to generate detailed reasoning logs, which are subsequently distilled into structured, human-understandable logical rules. The pipeline integrates multiple enhancements - efficient data ingestion, a two-step refinement process, ensemble candidate sampling, simulated reinforcement learning scoring, and persistent memory - to ensure both stable decision-making and transparent output. Experimental evaluations on curated startup datasets demonstrate that our combined pipeline improves precision by 54% from 0.225 to 0.346 and accuracy by 50% from 0.46 to 0.70 compared to a standalone OpenAI o3 model. Notably, our model achieves over 2x the precision of a random classifier (16%). By combining state-of-the-art AI reasoning with explicit rule-based explanations, our method not only augments traditional decision-making processes but also facilitates expert intervention and continuous policy refinement. This work lays the foundation for the implementation of interpretable LLM-powered decision frameworks in high-stakes investment environments and other domains that require transparent and data-driven insights.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 7 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2025.
Builds on
7 of 23 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
Other references · 6
- 2024Wisdom of the Silicon Crowd: LLM Ensemble Prediction Capabilities Rival Human Crowd Accuracycited by 67
- 2024A Fused Large Language Model for Predicting Startup Successcited by 13
- 2024GPTree: Towards Explainable Decision-Making via LLM-powered Decision Treescited by 13
- 2024SSFF: Investigating LLM Predictive Capabilities for Startup Success through a Multi-Agent Framework with Enhanced Explainability and Performancecited by 7
- 2023Founder-GPT: Self-play to evaluate the Founder-Idea fitcited by 6
- 2024Automating Venture Capital: Founder assessment using LLM-powered segmentation, feature engineering and automated labeling techniquescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
- 2025Random Rule Forest (RRF): Interpretable and Manageable Ensembles of LLM-Generated Questions for Predicting Success from Unstructured Datacited by 1
- 2025LLM-AR: LLM-powered Automated Reasoning Frameworkcited by 1
- 2025MGA-VQA: Secure and Interpretable Graph-Augmented Visual Question Answering with Memory-Guided Protection Against Unauthorized Knowledge Usecited by 1
- 2025MGA-VQA: Secure and Interpretable Graph-Augmented Visual Question Answering with Memory-Guided Protection Against Unauthorized Knowledge Use22 Nov 2025
- 2025LLM-AR: LLM-powered Automated Reasoning Framework24 Oct 2025
- 2025Random Rule Forest (RRF): Interpretable and Manageable Ensembles of LLM-Generated Questions for Predicting Success from Unstructured Data30 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Benchmark-Driven Selection of AI: Evidence from DeepSeek-R1
- 2026StartupBench: Benchmarking General-Purpose Agents on Market-Validated End-to-End Workflows
- 2025START: Self-taught Reasoner with Tools
- 2026FoE: Forest of Errors Makes the First Solution the Best in Large Reasoning Models
- 2026Measuring AI Reasoning: A Guide for Researchers
- 2025ThinkPilot: Steering Reasoning Models via Automated Think-prefixes Optimization
- 2025InternBootcamp: Boosting LLM Reasoning with Verifiable Task Scaling
- 2025Compute-Accuracy Pareto Frontiers for Open-Source Reasoning Large Language Models