mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automating Venture Capital: Founder assessment using LLM-powered segmentation, feature engineering and automated labeling techniques

arXiv 2407.04885 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study explores the application of large language models (LLMs) in venture capital (VC) decision-making, focusing on predicting startup success based on founder characteristics. We utilize LLM prompting techniques, like chain-of-thought, to generate features from limited data, then extract insights through statistics and machine learning. Our results reveal potential relationships between certain founder characteristics and success, as well as demonstrate the effectiveness of these characteristics in prediction. This framework for integrating ML techniques and LLMs has vast potential for improving startup success prediction, with important implications for VC firms seeking to optimize their investment strategies.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2024.

Builds on

4 of 22 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2024SSFF: Investigating LLM Predictive Capabilities for Startup Success through a Multi-Agent Framework with Enhanced Explainability and Performancecited by 7
  4. 2023Founder-GPT: Self-play to evaluate the Founder-Idea fitcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LLM-AR: LLM-powered Automated Reasoning Framework
  2. 2025CrunchLLM: Multitask LLMs for Structured Business Reasoning and Outcome Prediction
  3. 2025The Gaining Paths to Investment Success: Information-Driven LLM Graph Reasoning for Venture Capital Prediction
  4. 2025Interpreting LLMs as Credit Risk Classifiers: Do Their Feature Explanations Align with Classical ML?
  5. 2026Augmenting Fundamental Analysis with Large Language Models: A RAG-Based System for Generating Investor Briefs
  6. 2025Measuring What LLMs Think They Do: SHAP Faithfulness and Deployability on Financial Tabular Classification
  7. 2026From Stochastic Answers to Verifiable Reasoning: Interpretable Decision-Making with LLM-Generated Code
  8. 2026High-Stakes Personalization: Rethinking LLM Customization for Individual Investor Decision-Making