Deep Positive-Unlabeled Anomaly Detection for Contaminated Unlabeled Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Semi-supervised anomaly detection, which aims to improve the anomaly detection performance by using a small amount of labeled anomaly data in addition to unlabeled data, has attracted attention. Existing semi-supervised approaches assume that most unlabeled data are normal, and train anomaly detectors by minimizing the anomaly scores for the unlabeled data while maximizing those for the labeled anomaly data. However, in practice, the unlabeled data are often contaminated with anomalies. This weakens the effect of maximizing the anomaly scores for anomalies, and prevents us from improving the detection performance. To solve this, we propose the deep positive-unlabeled anomaly detection framework, which integrates positive-unlabeled learning with deep anomaly detection models such as autoencoders and deep support vector data descriptions. Our approach enables the approximation of anomaly scores for normal data using the unlabeled data and the labeled anomaly data. Therefore, without labeled normal data, our approach can train anomaly detectors by minimizing the anomaly scores for normal data while maximizing those for the labeled anomaly data. We also provide a theoretical analysis establishing a generalization error bound for the proposed objective, guaranteeing that the empirical minimizer converges asymptotically to the ideal minimizer. Our approach achieves better detection performance than existing approaches on various datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.
Builds on
38 of 81 references.
References · 38
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 942
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
- 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 514
- 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 490
- 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 453
- 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
- 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 425
- 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 291
26 more
- 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 219
- 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 219
- 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
- 2019OCGAN: One-class Novelty Detection Using GANs with Constrained Latent Representationscited by 199
- 2019Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative modelscited by 186
- 2020Likelihood Regret: An Out-of-Distribution Detection Score For Variational Auto-encodercited by 145
- 2022Catching Both Gray and Black Swans: Open-set Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 104
- 2021Neural Transformation Learning for Deep Anomaly Detection Beyond Imagescited by 99
- 2016Mixture Proportion Estimation via Kernel Embedding of Distributionscited by 67
- 2019Deep Weakly-supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 59
- 2021Hierarchical VAEs Know What They Don't Knowcited by 58
- 2016Deep Learning in Bioinformaticscited by 48
- 2022Latent Outlier Exposure for Anomaly Detection with Contaminated Datacited by 48
- 2016Class-prior Estimation for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 46
- 2020Toward Deep Supervised Anomaly Detection: Reinforcement Learning from Partially Labeled Anomaly Datacited by 42
- 2021Feature Encoding with AutoEncoders for Weakly-supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 42
- 2016Theoretical Comparisons of Positive-Unlabeled Learning against Positive-Negative Learningcited by 41
- 2018Variational Autoencoders for New Physics Mining at the Large Hadron Collidercited by 41
- 2021Autoencoding Under Normalization Constraintscited by 26
- 2016Estimating the class prior and posterior from noisy positives and unlabeled datacited by 25
- 2018Anomaly Detection using Autoencoders in High Performance Computing Systemscited by 25
- 2016Loss factorization, weakly supervised learning and label noise robustnesscited by 24
- 2020Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data with Arbitrary Positive Shiftcited by 23
- 2019Autoencoding Binary Classifiers for Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 17
- 2023Deep Anomaly Detection under Labeling Budget Constraintscited by 9
- 2021Positive-Unlabeled Classification under Class-Prior Shift: A Prior-invariant Approach Based on Density Ratio Estimationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.