mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Bilevel Optimization in Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2405.18209 ↗First posted 28 May 2024cs.RO cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring safety in MARL, particularly when deploying it in real-world applications such as autonomous driving, emerges as a critical challenge. To address this challenge, traditional safe MARL methods extend MARL approaches to incorporate safety considerations, aiming to minimize safety risk values. However, these safe MARL algorithms often fail to model other agents and lack convergence guarantees, particularly in dynamically complex environments. In this study, we propose a safe MARL method grounded in a Stackelberg model with bi-level optimization, for which convergence analysis is provided. Derived from our theoretical analysis, we develop two practical algorithms, namely Constrained Stackelberg Q-learning (CSQ) and Constrained Stackelberg Multi-Agent Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (CS-MADDPG), designed to facilitate MARL decision-making in autonomous driving applications. To evaluate the effectiveness of our algorithms, we developed a safe MARL autonomous driving benchmark and conducted experiments on challenging autonomous driving scenarios, such as merges, roundabouts, intersections, and racetracks. The experimental results indicate that our algorithms, CSQ and CS-MADDPG, outperform several strong MARL baselines, such as Bi-AC, MACPO, and MAPPO-L, regarding reward and safety performance. The demos and source code are available at {https://github.com/SafeRL-Lab/Safe-MARL-in-Autonomous-Driving.git}.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2024.

Builds on

21 of 48 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  2. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  3. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  4. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  5. 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
  6. 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 475
  7. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
  8. 2021Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
  9. 2022A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applicationscited by 169
  10. 2021Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 60
  11. 2021Settling the Variance of Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 45
  12. 2019Bi-level Actor-Critic for Multi-agent Coordinationcited by 38
9 more
  1. 2021Deep Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Highway On-Ramp Merging in Mixed Trafficcited by 38
  2. 2022Robust Reinforcement Learning as a Stackelberg Game via Adaptively-Regularized Adversarial Trainingcited by 26
  3. 2021Stackelberg Actor-Critic: Game-Theoretic Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 18
  4. 2020SMART: Simultaneous Multi-Agent Recurrent Trajectory Predictioncited by 15
  5. 2023A Human-Centered Safe Robot Reinforcement Learning Framework with Interactive Behaviorscited by 13
  6. 2023Provably Efficient Generalized Lagrangian Policy Optimization for Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  7. 2022Spatial-Temporal-Aware Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning of Connected Autonomous Vehicles in Challenging Scenarioscited by 12
  8. 2021Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning through Decentralized Multiple Control Barrier Functionscited by 9
  9. 2019Gradient Methods for Solving Stackelberg Gamescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

9 papers.