mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding Linear Probing then Fine-tuning Language Models from NTK Perspective

arXiv 2405.16747 ↗First posted 27 May 2024cs.LGcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The two-stage fine-tuning (FT) method, linear probing (LP) then fine-tuning (LP-FT), outperforms linear probing and FT alone. This holds true for both in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) data. One key reason for its success is the preservation of pre-trained features, achieved by obtaining a near-optimal linear head during LP. However, despite the widespread use of large language models, there has been limited exploration of more complex architectures such as Transformers. In this paper, we analyze the training dynamics of LP-FT for classification tasks on the basis of the neural tangent kernel (NTK) theory. Our analysis decomposes the NTK matrix into two components. This decomposition highlights the importance of the linear head norm alongside the prediction accuracy at the start of the FT stage. We also observe a significant increase in the linear head norm during LP, which stems from training with the cross-entropy (CE) loss. This increase in the linear head norm effectively reduces changes in learned features. Furthermore, we find that this increased norm can adversely affect model calibration, which can be corrected using temperature scaling. Additionally, we extend our analysis with the NTK to the low-rank adaptation (LoRA) method and validate its effectiveness. Our experiments using a Transformer-based model on multiple natural language processing datasets confirm our theoretical analysis. Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of LP-FT for fine-tuning language models. Code is available at https://github.com/tom4649/lp-ft_ntk.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2024.

Builds on

39 of 62 references.

References · 39

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  5. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  6. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  7. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  8. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  9. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
  10. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
  11. 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 872
  12. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
27 more
  1. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 738
  2. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
  3. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
  4. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 573
  5. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
  6. 2020AdapterHub: A Framework for Adapting Transformerscited by 444
  7. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
  8. 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Just Forward Passescited by 345
  9. 2019SMART: Robust and Efficient Fine-Tuning for Pre-trained Natural Language Models through Principled Regularized Optimizationcited by 254
  10. 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
  11. 2020Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 187
  12. 2020On the Theory of Transfer Learning: The Importance of Task Diversitycited by 186
  13. 2017PubMed 200k RCT: a Dataset for Sequential Sentence Classification in Medical Abstractscited by 124
  14. 2022A Kernel-Based View of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 121
  15. 2023The Expressive Power of Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 102
  16. 2023Revisiting Out-of-distribution Robustness in NLP: Benchmark, Analysis, and LLMs Evaluationscited by 97
  17. 2022More Than a Toy: Random Matrix Models Predict How Real-World Neural Representations Generalizecited by 91
  18. 2022Revisiting Parameter-Efficient Tuning: Are We Really There Yet?cited by 76
  19. 2020Rethinking the Hyperparameters for Fine-tuningcited by 69
  20. 2020DynaSent: A Dynamic Benchmark for Sentiment Analysiscited by 63
  21. 2022Fast Finite Width Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 62
  22. 2019Adjusting Decision Boundary for Class Imbalanced Learningcited by 52
  23. 2022A Fast, Well-Founded Approximation to the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 30
  24. 2022Better Supervisory Signals by Observing Learning Pathscited by 21
  25. 2023A Closer Look at Model Adaptation using Feature Distortion and Simplicity Biascited by 20
  26. 2023How to prepare your task head for finetuningcited by 19
  27. 2023Domain-Aware Fine-Tuning: Enhancing Neural Network Adaptabilitycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 14.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025LoRA Training Provably Converges to a Low-Rank Global Minimum or It Fails Loudly (But it Probably Won't Fail)cited by 20
  2. 2024Propulsion: Steering LLM with Tiny Fine-Tuningcited by 14
  3. 2025Training Dynamics of the Cooldown Stage in Warmup-Stable-Decay Learning Rate Schedulercited by 12
  4. 2025When Truthful Representations Flip Under Deceptive Instructions?cited by 10
  5. 2026A Theory of How Pretraining Shapes Inductive Bias in Fine-Tuningcited by 5
  6. 2026Learning Dynamics in RL Post-Training for Language Modelscited by 2
  7. 2026EUGens: Efficient, Unified, and General Dense Layerscited by 2
  8. 2026Linearization Explains Fine-Tuning in Large Language Modelscited by 2
  9. 2026The Identity Trap in EEG Foundation Models: A Diagnostic Auditcited by 2
  10. 2025Safety Alignment Depth in Large Language Models: A Markov Chain Perspectivecited by 1
  11. 2024EUGens: Efficient, Unified, and General Dense Layerscited by 0
  12. 2025Nested-ReFT: Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Model Fine-Tuning via Off-Policy Rolloutscited by 0
10 more
  1. 2025Toward Scalable Early Cancer Detection: Evaluating EHR-Based Predictive Models Against Traditional Screening Criteriacited by 0
  2. 2026VISER: Visually-Informed System for Enhanced Robustness in Iris Presentation Attack Detectioncited by 0
  3. 2026Relational Probing: LM-to-Graph Adaptation for Financial Predictioncited by 0
  4. 2026Unveiling the Backdoor Mechanism Hidden Behind Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 0
  5. 2026DARE-EEG: A Foundation Model for Mining Dual-Aligned Representation of EEGcited by 0
  6. 2026Loss Smoothing for Stable Adaptation Under Distribution Shiftcited by 0
  7. 2026Optimal Self-Distillation for Rectified Flow via Linear Probingcited by 0
  8. 2026Two-Timescale Fine-tuning Provably Learns New Features for Two-Layer ReLU Networkscited by 0
  9. 2026Statistical Benefits of Fine-Tuning from Pretrained Initialization in Diagonal Linear Networkscited by 0
  10. 2026Rationally Linearized MLPscited by 0