mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Theory of How Pretraining Shapes Inductive Bias in Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2602.20062 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pretraining and fine-tuning are central stages in modern machine learning systems. In practice, feature learning plays an important role across both stages: deep neural networks learn a broad range of useful features during pretraining and further refine those features during fine-tuning. However, an end-to-end theoretical understanding of how choices of initialization impact the ability to reuse and refine features during fine-tuning has remained elusive. Here we develop an analytical theory of the pretraining fine-tuning pipeline in diagonal linear networks, deriving exact expressions for the generalization error as a function of initialization parameters and task statistics. We find that different initialization choices place the network into four distinct fine-tuning regimes that are distinguished by their ability to support feature learning and reuse and therefore by the task statistics for which they are beneficial. In particular, a smaller initialization scale in earlier layers enables the network to both reuse and refine its features, leading to superior generalization on fine-tuning tasks that rely on a subset of pretraining features. We demonstrate empirically that the same initialization parameters impact generalization in ResNets trained on CIFAR-100 and SVHN as well as Transformers trained on modular arithmetic tasks. Overall, our results demonstrate an alytically how data and network initialization interact to shape fine-tuning generalization, highlighting an important role for the relative scale of initialization across different layers in enabling continued feature learning during fine-tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2026.

Builds on

38 of 58 references.

References · 38

  1. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  2. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  3. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  4. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  5. 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
  6. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  7. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
  8. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  9. 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 308
  10. 2020Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Modelscited by 302
  11. 2020Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Wide Two-layer Neural Networks Trained with the Logistic Losscited by 267
  12. 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 259
26 more
  1. 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
  2. 2020Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 185
  3. 2018A mathematical theory of semantic development in deep neural networkscited by 182
  4. 2022A Kernel-Based View of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 118
  5. 2023Mechanistically analyzing the effects of fine-tuning on procedurally defined taskscited by 110
  6. 2021Implicit Bias of SGD for Diagonal Linear Networks: a Provable Benefit of Stochasticitycited by 107
  7. 2021Neural Networks as Kernel Learners: The Silent Alignment Effectcited by 106
  8. 2019How do infinite width bounded norm networks look in function space?cited by 105
  9. 2018An analytic theory of generalization dynamics and transfer learning in deep linear networkscited by 84
  10. 2021On the Implicit Bias of Initialization Shape: Beyond Infinitesimal Mirror Descentcited by 69
  11. 2024The Ultimate Guide to Fine-Tuning LLMs from Basics to Breakthroughs: An Exhaustive Review of Technologies, Research, Best Practices, Applied Research Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 63
  12. 2023Saddle-to-Saddle Dynamics in Diagonal Linear Networkscited by 54
  13. 2019Lexicographic and Depth-Sensitive Margins in Homogeneous and Non-Homogeneous Deep Modelscited by 53
  14. 2024From Lazy to Rich: Exact Learning Dynamics in Deep Linear Networkscited by 46
  15. 2023Abide by the Law and Follow the Flow: Conservation Laws for Gradient Flowscited by 44
  16. 2024Get rich quick: exact solutions reveal how unbalanced initializations promote rapid feature learningcited by 41
  17. 2022Limitations of the NTK for Understanding Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 34
  18. 2024Get more for less: Principled Data Selection for Warming Up Fine-Tuning in LLMscited by 32
  19. 2022Incremental Learning in Diagonal Linear Networkscited by 27
  20. 2024Understanding Linear Probing then Fine-tuning Language Models from NTK Perspectivecited by 21
  21. 2021A Theoretical Analysis of Fine-tuning with Linear Teacherscited by 17
  22. 2024Features are fate: a theory of transfer learning in high-dimensional regressioncited by 10
  23. 2023Inductive biases of multi-task learning and finetuning: multiple regimes of feature reusecited by 9
  24. 2024Ask Your Distribution Shift if Pre-Training is Right for Youcited by 7
  25. 2025A Theory of Initialisation's Impact on Specialisationcited by 6
  26. 2025Train on Validation (ToV): Fast data selection with applications to fine-tuningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.