mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How to prepare your task head for finetuning

arXiv 2302.05779 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In deep learning, transferring information from a pretrained network to a downstream task by finetuning has many benefits. The choice of task head plays an important role in fine-tuning, as the pretrained and downstream tasks are usually different. Although there exist many different designs for finetuning, a full understanding of when and why these algorithms work has been elusive. We analyze how the choice of task head controls feature adaptation and hence influences the downstream performance. By decomposing the learning dynamics of adaptation, we find that the key aspect is the training accuracy and loss at the beginning of finetuning, which determines the "energy" available for the feature's adaptation. We identify a significant trend in the effect of changes in this initial energy on the resulting features after fine-tuning. Specifically, as the energy increases, the Euclidean and cosine distances between the resulting and original features increase, while their dot products (and the resulting features' norm) first increase and then decrease. Inspired by this, we give several practical principles that lead to better downstream performance. We analytically prove this trend in an overparamterized linear setting and verify its applicability to different experimental settings.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2023.

Builds on

28 of 46 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  5. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  6. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  7. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  8. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  9. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  10. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  11. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  12. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
16 more
  1. 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,037
  2. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
  3. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  4. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
  5. 2018Bag of Tricks for Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 430
  6. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 419
  7. 2021Pre-training Molecular Graph Representation with 3D Geometrycited by 248
  8. 2020Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuningcited by 237
  9. 2020Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural Networkscited by 182
  10. 2018Algorithmic Regularization in Learning Deep Homogeneous Models: Layers are Automatically Balancedcited by 172
  11. 2019To Tune or Not to Tune? Adapting Pretrained Representations to Diverse Taskscited by 167
  12. 2018SpotTune: Transfer Learning through Adaptive Fine-tuningcited by 166
  13. 2020Better Fine-Tuning by Reducing Representational Collapsecited by 156
  14. 2021Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficultycited by 139
  15. 2020Rethinking the Hyperparameters for Fine-tuningcited by 69
  16. 2022Fortuitous Forgetting in Connectionist Networkscited by 39

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Learning Dynamics of LLM Finetuningcited by 93
  2. 2023E^2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 70
  3. 2025Training Strategies for Efficient Embodied Reasoningcited by 53
  4. 2024Visual Fourier Prompt Tuningcited by 30
  5. 2024Understanding Linear Probing then Fine-tuning Language Models from NTK Perspectivecited by 21
  6. 2023Guiding The Last Layer in Federated Learning with Pre-Trained Modelscited by 13
  7. 2023UZH_CLyp at SemEval-2023 Task 9: Head-First Fine-Tuning and ChatGPT Data Generation for Cross-Lingual Learning in Tweet Intimacy Predictioncited by 8
  8. 2025Overcoming Vocabulary Constraints with Pixel-level Fallbackcited by 6
  9. 2025Why is Your Language Model a Poor Implicit Reward Model?cited by 6
  10. 2025RINO: Renormalization Group Invariance with No Labelscited by 6
  11. 2024Understanding Simplicity Bias towards Compositional Mappings via Learning Dynamicscited by 5
  12. 2023Synaptic Weight Distributions Depend on the Geometry of Plasticitycited by 4
6 more
  1. 2024Feature Alignment: Rethinking Efficient Active Learning via Proxy in the Context of Pre-trained Modelscited by 4
  2. 2023Domain-Aware Fine-Tuning: Enhancing Neural Network Adaptabilitycited by 3
  3. 2026Dataless Weight Disentanglement in Task Arithmetic via Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 3
  4. 2026Learning Dynamics in RL Post-Training for Language Modelscited by 2
  5. 2023First-order ANIL provably learns representations despite overparametrizationcited by 0
  6. 2026Adapting Vision Foundation Models with Cascaded Semanticscited by 0