mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Decomposing the Neurons: Activation Sparsity via Mixture of Experts for Continual Test Time Adaptation

arXiv 2405.16486 ↗First posted 26 May 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 10

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE theory and gating functions

Abstract (arXiv)

Continual Test-Time Adaptation (CTTA), which aims to adapt the pre-trained model to ever-evolving target domains, emerges as an important task for vision models. As current vision models appear to be heavily biased towards texture, continuously adapting the model from one domain distribution to another can result in serious catastrophic forgetting. Drawing inspiration from the human visual system's adeptness at processing both shape and texture according to the famous Trichromatic Theory, we explore the integration of a Mixture-of-Activation-Sparsity-Experts (MoASE) as an adapter for the CTTA task. Given the distinct reaction of neurons with low/high activation to domain-specific/agnostic features, MoASE decomposes the neural activation into high-activation and low-activation components with a non-differentiable Spatial Differentiate Dropout (SDD). Based on the decomposition, we devise a multi-gate structure comprising a Domain-Aware Gate (DAG) that utilizes domain information to adaptive combine experts that process the post-SDD sparse activations of different strengths, and the Activation Sparsity Gate (ASG) that adaptively assigned feature selection threshold of the SDD for different experts for more precise feature decomposition. Finally, we introduce a Homeostatic-Proximal (HP) loss to bypass the error accumulation problem when continuously adapting the model. Extensive experiments on four prominent benchmarks substantiate that our methodology achieves state-of-the-art performance in both classification and segmentation CTTA tasks. Our code is now available at https://github.com/RoyZry98/MoASE-Pytorch.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE theory and gating functions, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 54 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2024.

Builds on

54 of 80 references.

References · 54

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  3. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  4. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  5. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
  6. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  7. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  8. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,940
  9. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  10. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
  11. 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,631
  12. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,369
38 more
  1. 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,087
  2. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 986
  3. 2021Scaling Vision with Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 747
  4. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 719
  5. 2022Mixture-of-Experts with Expert Choice Routingcited by 623
  6. 2020FDA: Fourier Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 541
  7. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
  8. 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 379
  9. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 359
  10. 2023Occ3D: A Large-Scale 3D Occupancy Prediction Benchmark for Autonomous Drivingcited by 332
  11. 2022BEVFormer v2: Adapting Modern Image Backbones to Bird's-Eye-View Recognition via Perspective Supervisioncited by 302
  12. 2021A Fourier-based Framework for Domain Generalizationcited by 290
  13. 2013Learning Factored Representations in a Deep Mixture of Expertscited by 278
  14. 2021Hash Layers For Large Sparse Modelscited by 237
  15. 2020OccuSeg: Occupancy-aware 3D Instance Segmentationcited by 177
  16. 2023ManipLLM: Embodied Multimodal Large Language Model for Object-Centric Robotic Manipulationcited by 162
  17. 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
  18. 2023Motion Planning for Autonomous Driving: The State of the Art and Future Perspectivescited by 114
  19. 2022Robust Mean Teacher for Continual and Gradual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 104
  20. 2022StableMoE: Stable Routing Strategy for Mixture of Expertscited by 100
  21. 2022M3ViT: Mixture-of-Experts Vision Transformer for Efficient Multi-task Learning with Model-Accelerator Co-designcited by 98
  22. 2022Decorate the Newcomers: Visual Domain Prompt for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 98
  23. 2023TextDeformer: Geometry Manipulation using Text Guidancecited by 94
  24. 2023ReLU Strikes Back: Exploiting Activation Sparsity in Large Language Modelscited by 94
  25. 2017Learning to select data for transfer learning with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 64
  26. 2023SparseViT: Revisiting Activation Sparsity for Efficient High-Resolution Vision Transformercited by 60
  27. 2023ViDA: Homeostatic Visual Domain Adapter for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 58
  28. 2022A Probabilistic Framework for Lifelong Test-Time Adaptationcited by 46
  29. 2024ProSparse: Introducing and Enhancing Intrinsic Activation Sparsity within Large Language Modelscited by 45
  30. 2021Adversarial Learning for Zero-Shot Stance Detection on Social Mediacited by 37
  31. 2023SiRA: Sparse Mixture of Low Rank Adaptationcited by 32
  32. 2023Continual-MAE: Adaptive Distribution Masked Autoencoders for Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 30
  33. 2024BECoTTA: Input-dependent Online Blending of Experts for Continual Test-time Adaptationcited by 25
  34. 2022BEV-SAN: Accurate BEV 3D Object Detection via Slice Attention Networkscited by 20
  35. 2024Multi-level Personalized Federated Learning on Heterogeneous and Long-Tailed Datacited by 14
  36. 2023Emergence of Shape Bias in Convolutional Neural Networks through Activation Sparsitycited by 11
  37. 2023Accelerating Deep Neural Networks via Semi-Structured Activation Sparsitycited by 10
  38. 2023Distribution-Aware Continual Test-Time Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 10

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Continual Test-Time Adaptation in Computer Vision: Methods, Benchmarks, and Future Directions
  2. 2023Exploiting Activation Sparsity with Dense to Dynamic-k Mixture-of-Experts Conversion
  3. 2026Decomposing and Composing: Towards Efficient Vision-Language Continual Learning via Rank-1 Expert Pool in a Single LoRA
  4. 2025Understanding and Harnessing Sparsity in Unified Multimodal Models
  5. 2025CoreMatching: A Co-adaptive Sparse Inference Framework with Token and Neuron Pruning for Comprehensive Acceleration of Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026DOME: Learning Transferable Domain Variables from Sparse Supervision for Test-Time Adaptation
  7. 2025BayesTTA: Continual-Temporal Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models via Gaussian Discriminant Analysis
  8. 2026FLAME: Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts for Continual Multimodal Multi-Task Learning