Emergence of Shape Bias in Convolutional Neural Networks through Activation Sparsity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current deep-learning models for object recognition are known to be heavily biased toward texture. In contrast, human visual systems are known to be biased toward shape and structure. What could be the design principles in human visual systems that led to this difference? How could we introduce more shape bias into the deep learning models? In this paper, we report that sparse coding, a ubiquitous principle in the brain, can in itself introduce shape bias into the network. We found that enforcing the sparse coding constraint using a non-differential Top-K operation can lead to the emergence of structural encoding in neurons in convolutional neural networks, resulting in a smooth decomposition of objects into parts and subparts and endowing the networks with shape bias. We demonstrated this emergence of shape bias and its functional benefits for different network structures with various datasets. For object recognition convolutional neural networks, the shape bias leads to greater robustness against style and pattern change distraction. For the image synthesis generative adversary networks, the emerged shape bias leads to more coherent and decomposable structures in the synthesized images. Ablation studies suggest that sparse codes tend to encode structures, whereas the more distributed codes tend to favor texture. Our code is host at the github repository: urlhttps://github.com/Crazy-Jack/nips2023shapevstexture
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2023.
Builds on
16 of 39 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2017Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalizationcited by 1,998
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,268
- 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 690
- 2019Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNetcited by 260
- 2019Learning De-biased Representations with Biased Representationscited by 199
- 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
- 2021Towards Faster and Stabilized GAN Training for High-fidelity Few-shot Image Synthesiscited by 140
4 more
- 2021Is Attention Better Than Matrix Decomposition?cited by 75
- 2019Are Adversarial Robustness and Common Perturbation Robustness Independent Attributes ?cited by 25
- 2020Achieving Adversarial Robustness via Sparsitycited by 14
- 2017Visual Concepts and Compositional Votingcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2025MoLe-VLA: Dynamic Layer-skipping Vision Language Action Model via Mixture-of-Layers for Efficient Robot Manipulationcited by 69
- 2024Toward a Holistic Evaluation of Robustness in CLIP Modelscited by 13
- 2025Dissecting Generalized Category Discovery: Multiplex Consensus under Self-Deconstructioncited by 13
- 2024Decomposing the Neurons: Activation Sparsity via Mixture of Experts for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 10
- 2025Perceptual Inductive Bias Is What You Need Before Contrastive Learningcited by 4
- 2025Visual Anagrams Reveal Hidden Differences in Holistic Shape Processing Across Vision Modelscited by 3
- 2025SAMSOD: Rethinking SAM Optimization for RGB-T Salient Object Detectioncited by 3
- 2026On the Reliability of Cue Conflict and Beyondcited by 1
- 2024The Role of Recurrency in Image Segmentation for Noisy and Limited Sample Settingscited by 0
- 2026ShapeY: A Principled Framework for Measuring Shape Recognition Capacity via Nearest-Neighbor Matchingcited by 0
- 2026MoASE++: Mixture of Activation Sparsity Experts with Domain-Adaptive On-policy Distillation for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 0
- 2026MoASE++: Mixture of Activation Sparsity Experts with Domain-Adaptive On-policy Distillation for Continual Test Time Adaptation18 May 2026
- 2026ShapeY: A Principled Framework for Measuring Shape Recognition Capacity via Nearest-Neighbor Matching27 Apr 2026
- 2026On the Reliability of Cue Conflict and Beyond11 Mar 2026
- 2025SAMSOD: Rethinking SAM Optimization for RGB-T Salient Object Detection4 Oct 2025
- 2025Dissecting Generalized Category Discovery: Multiplex Consensus under Self-Deconstruction14 Aug 2025
- 2025Visual Anagrams Reveal Hidden Differences in Holistic Shape Processing Across Vision Models1 Jul 2025
- 2025Perceptual Inductive Bias Is What You Need Before Contrastive Learning1 Jun 2025
- 2025MoLe-VLA: Dynamic Layer-skipping Vision Language Action Model via Mixture-of-Layers for Efficient Robot Manipulation26 Mar 2025
- 2024The Role of Recurrency in Image Segmentation for Noisy and Limited Sample Settings20 Dec 2024
- 2024Toward a Holistic Evaluation of Robustness in CLIP Models2 Oct 2024
- 2024Decomposing the Neurons: Activation Sparsity via Mixture of Experts for Continual Test Time Adaptation26 May 2024