Improving Health Professionals' Onboarding with AI and XAI for Trustworthy Human-AI Collaborative Decision Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With advanced AI/ML, there has been growing research on explainable AI (XAI) and studies on how humans interact with AI and XAI for effective human-AI collaborative decision-making. However, we still have a lack of understanding of how AI systems and XAI should be first presented to users without technical backgrounds. In this paper, we present the findings of semi-structured interviews with health professionals (n=12) and students (n=4) majoring in medicine and health to study how to improve onboarding with AI and XAI. For the interviews, we built upon human-AI interaction guidelines to create onboarding materials of an AI system for stroke rehabilitation assessment and AI explanations and introduce them to the participants. Our findings reveal that beyond presenting traditional performance metrics on AI, participants desired benchmark information, the practical benefits of AI, and interaction trials to better contextualize AI performance, and refine the objectives and performance of AI. Based on these findings, we highlight directions for improving onboarding with AI and XAI and human-AI collaborative decision-making.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2024.
Builds on
25 of 73 references.
References · 25
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
- 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
- 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
- 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 167
- 2019One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniquescited by 164
13 more
- 2019Human-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms during Medical Decision-Makingcited by 109
- 2021Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studiescited by 86
- 2019The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologiescited by 78
- 2021Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their Needscited by 64
- 2020Trustworthy AIcited by 62
- 2022Interactive Model Cards: A Human-Centered Approach to Model Documentationcited by 61
- 2019Unremarkable AI: Fitting Intelligent Decision Support into Critical, Clinical Decision-Making Processescited by 53
- 2019"The Human Body is a Black Box": Supporting Clinical Decision-Making with Deep Learningcited by 39
- 2019Embedding Comparator: Visualizing Differences in Global Structure and Local Neighborhoods via Small Multiplescited by 38
- 2019Efficient Saliency Maps for Explainable AIcited by 30
- 2023Understanding Frontline Workers' and Unhoused Individuals' Perspectives on AI Used in Homeless Servicescited by 29
- 2021"Brilliant AI Doctor" in Rural China: Tensions and Challenges in AI-Powered CDSS Deploymentcited by 28
- 2021Ethics-Based Auditing to Develop Trustworthy AIcited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.