mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Causally Robust Reward Learning from Reason-Augmented Preference Feedback

arXiv 2603.04861 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2026cs.AI cs.LG cs.ROcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Preference-based reward learning is widely used for shaping agent behavior to match a user's preference, yet its sparse binary feedback makes it especially vulnerable to causal confusion. The learned reward often latches onto spurious features that merely co-occur with preferred trajectories during training, collapsing when those correlations disappear or reverse at test time. We introduce ReCouPLe, a lightweight framework that uses natural language rationales to provide the missing causal signal. Each rationale is treated as a guiding projection axis in an embedding space, training the model to score trajectories based on features aligned with that axis while de-emphasizing context that is unrelated to the stated reason. Because the same rationales (e.g., "avoids collisions", "completes the task faster") can appear across multiple tasks, ReCouPLe naturally reuses the same causal direction whenever tasks share semantics, and transfers preference knowledge to novel tasks without extra data or language-model fine-tuning. Our learned reward model can ground preferences on the articulated reason, aligning better with user intent and generalizing beyond spurious features. ReCouPLe outperforms baselines by up to 1.5x in reward accuracy under distribution shifts, and 2x in downstream policy performance in novel tasks. We have released our code at https://github.com/mj-hwang/ReCouPLe

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 35 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

Builds on

35 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Pragmatic Feature Preferences: Learning Reward-Relevant Preferences from Human Input23 May
  2. 2024PREDILECT: Preferences Delineated with Zero-Shot Language-based Reasoning in Reinforcement Learning23 Feb
  3. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback27 Jul
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  5. 2023Inverse Preference Learning: Preference-based RL without a Reward Function24 May
  6. 2023Direct Preference-based Policy Optimization without Reward Modeling30 Jan
  7. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization19 Oct
  8. 2022Causal Confusion and Reward Misidentification in Preference-Based Reward Learning13 Apr
  9. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training9 Jun
  10. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 25

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  4. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  5. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,576
  6. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
  7. 2022ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Modelscited by 598
  8. 2021Mastering Visual Continuous Control: Improved Data-Augmented Reinforcement Learningcited by 359
  9. 2018HG-DAgger: Interactive Imitation Learning with Human Expertscited by 245
  10. 2024ManiSkill3: GPU Parallelized Robotics Simulation and Rendering for Generalizable Embodied AIcited by 216
  11. 2018Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Lawcited by 132
  12. 2023Large Language Models for Robotics: A Surveycited by 132
13 more
  1. 2023RoboCLIP: One Demonstration is Enough to Learn Robot Policiescited by 128
  2. 2024Yell At Your Robot: Improving On-the-Fly from Language Correctionscited by 123
  3. 2019Using Natural Language for Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
  4. 2022Correcting Robot Plans with Natural Language Feedbackcited by 68
  5. 2019Asking Easy Questions: A User-Friendly Approach to Active Reward Learningcited by 67
  6. 2023"No, to the Right" -- Online Language Corrections for Robotic Manipulation via Shared Autonomycited by 60
  7. 2024RACER: Rich Language-Guided Failure Recovery Policies for Imitation Learningcited by 46
  8. 2022LATTE: LAnguage Trajectory TransformErcited by 40
  9. 2020Active Preference Learning using Maximum Regretcited by 21
  10. 2024Trajectory Improvement and Reward Learning from Comparative Language Feedbackcited by 17
  11. 2018Learning from Richer Human Guidance: Augmenting Comparison-Based Learning with Feature Queriescited by 16
  12. 2021Object-Aware Regularization for Addressing Causal Confusion in Imitation Learningcited by 16
  13. 2025MILE: Model-based Intervention Learningcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Preference Learning for AI Alignment: a Causal Perspective
  2. 2026A Regret Minimization Framework on Preference Learning in Large Language Models
  3. 2022Symbol Guided Hindsight Priors for Reward Learning from Human Preferences
  4. 2025Similarity as Reward Alignment: Robust and Versatile Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026CoRe: Combined Rewards with Vision-Language Model Feedback for Preference-Aligned Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2025PaTaRM: Bridging Pairwise and Pointwise Signals via Preference-Aware Task-Adaptive Reward Modeling
  7. 2025Capturing Individual Human Preferences with Reward Features
  8. 2024RRM: Robust Reward Model Training Mitigates Reward Hacking