PhiNets: Brain-inspired Non-contrastive Learning Based on Temporal Prediction Hypothesis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Predictive coding is a theory which hypothesises that cortex predicts sensory inputs at various levels of abstraction to minimise prediction errors. Inspired by predictive coding, Chen et al. (2024) proposed another theory, temporal prediction hypothesis, to claim that sequence memory residing in hippocampus has emerged through predicting input signals from the past sensory inputs. Specifically, they supposed that the CA3 predictor in hippocampus creates synaptic delay between input signals, which is compensated by the following CA1 predictor. Though recorded neural activities were replicated based on the temporal prediction hypothesis, its validity has not been fully explored. In this work, we aim to explore the temporal prediction hypothesis from the perspective of self-supervised learning. Specifically, we focus on non-contrastive learning, which generates two augmented views of an input image and predicts one from another. Non-contrastive learning is intimately related to the temporal prediction hypothesis because the synaptic delay is implicitly created by StopGradient. Building upon a popular non-contrastive learner, SimSiam, we propose PhiNet, an extension of SimSiam to have two predictors explicitly corresponding to the CA3 and CA1, respectively. Through studying the PhiNet model, we discover two findings. First, meaningful data representations emerge in PhiNet more stably than in SimSiam. This is initially supported by our learning dynamics analysis: PhiNet is more robust to the representational collapse. Second, PhiNet adapts more quickly to newly incoming patterns in online and continual learning scenarios. For practitioners, we additionally propose an extension called X-PhiNet integrated with a momentum encoder, excelling in continual learning. All in all, our work reveals that the temporal prediction hypothesis is a reasonable model in terms of the robustness and adaptivity.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2024.
Builds on
39 of 59 references.
References · 39
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
- 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
- 2019Data-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 672
- 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Videocited by 490
27 more
- 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 461
- 2021Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairscited by 254
- 2018Re-evaluating Continual Learning Scenarios: A Categorization and Case for Strong Baselinescited by 228
- 2019Video Representation Learning by Dense Predictive Codingcited by 175
- 2021Self-Supervised Models are Continual Learnerscited by 149
- 2020Memory-augmented Dense Predictive Coding for Video Representation Learningcited by 137
- 2021Self-supervised Learning is More Robust to Dataset Imbalancecited by 122
- 2022Learning Fast, Learning Slow: A General Continual Learning Method based on Complementary Learning Systemcited by 110
- 2021Representational Continuity for Unsupervised Continual Learningcited by 95
- 2020Convolutional Neural Networks as a Model of the Visual System: Past, Present, and Futurecited by 83
- 2022Learning Fast and Slow for Online Time Series Forecastingcited by 43
- 2022Understanding Self-Predictive Learning for Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
- 2023The SSL Interplay: Augmentations, Inductive Bias, and Generalizationcited by 40
- 2023Feature-Learning Networks Are Consistent Across Widths At Realistic Scalescited by 40
- 2021DualNet: Continual Learning, Fast and Slowcited by 39
- 2022Do More Negative Samples Necessarily Hurt in Contrastive Learning?cited by 39
- 2019Unsupervised Progressive Learning and the STAM Architecturecited by 29
- 2022Backpropagation at the Infinitesimal Inference Limit of Energy-Based Models: Unifying Predictive Coding, Equilibrium Propagation, and Contrastive Hebbian Learningcited by 26
- 2018Deep Predictive Coding Network with Local Recurrent Processing for Object Recognitioncited by 25
- 2021On the Surrogate Gap between Contrastive and Supervised Lossescited by 25
- 2022What shapes the loss landscape of self-supervised learning?cited by 19
- 2022A Theoretical Framework for Inference Learningcited by 17
- 2022Implicit variance regularization in non-contrastive SSLcited by 15
- 2021Continual Contrastive Learning for Image Classificationcited by 11
- 2023Random Teachers are Good Teacherscited by 6
- 2023Multiscale Video Pretraining for Long-Term Activity Forecastingcited by 6
- 2023Feature Normalization Prevents Collapse of Non-contrastive Learning Dynamicscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.