mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neither Adversarial Training Nor Purification: Emergent Adversarial Robustness from Oscillatory Predictive Learning

arXiv 2609.08683 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial robustness in computer vision is still largely achieved through adversarial training or test-time adversarial purification, both of which introduce significant computational overhead by generating adversarial examples during training or performing iterative denoising at test time. We study whether empirical robustness can instead emerge from architectural and representation-learning inductive biases. We introduce Oscillatory Predictive Learning (OPL), a two-stage framework that combines Artificial Kuramoto Oscillatory Neurons (AKOrN) with predictive self-supervised pretraining using X-PhiNet. Because our default checkpoint uses randomized initial oscillator states, we compare it with other randomized adversarial defense methods that provide precise, reproducible, and strong attack protocols. Experiments on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, with additional corruption evaluation on CIFAR-10-C, demonstrate that our method achieves competitive results under the AutoAttack-rand evaluation protocol. On CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, OPL attains 76.63±0.76% and 50.44% robust accuracy, respectively, under ℓ_∞, ε=8/255, AutoAttack-rand with EoT K=20.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.

Builds on

22 of 24 references.

References · 22

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  2. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  3. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  4. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  5. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  6. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  7. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  8. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 685
  9. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  10. 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 514
  11. 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 476
  12. 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 334
10 more
  1. 2020Adversarial Robustness: From Self-Supervised Pre-Training to Fine-Tuningcited by 153
  2. 2021Stable Neural ODE with Lyapunov-Stable Equilibrium Points for Defending Against Adversarial Attackscited by 91
  3. 2023Robust Evaluation of Diffusion-Based Adversarial Purificationcited by 65
  4. 2022Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Adaptive Test-time Defensescited by 64
  5. 2024Adversarial Robustness Limits via Scaling-Law and Human-Alignment Studiescited by 38
  6. 2024Artificial Kuramoto Oscillatory Neuronscited by 38
  7. 2024MeanSparse: Post-Training Robustness Enhancement Through Mean-Centered Feature Sparsificationcited by 21
  8. 2025Value-guided action planning with JEPA world modelscited by 21
  9. 2023Lyapunov-Stable Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 10
  10. 2024PhiNets: Brain-inspired Non-contrastive Learning Based on Temporal Prediction Hypothesiscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.