mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

T2VEval: Benchmark Dataset and Objective Evaluation Method for T2V-generated Videos

arXiv 2501.08545 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2025cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in text-to-video (T2V) technology, as demonstrated by models such as Runway Gen-3, Pika, Sora, and Kling, have significantly broadened the applicability and popularity of the technology. This progress has created a growing demand for accurate quality assessment metrics to evaluate the perceptual quality of T2V-generated videos and optimize video generation models. However, assessing the quality of text-to-video outputs remain challenging due to the presence of highly complex distortions, such as unnatural actions and phenomena that defy human cognition. To address these challenges, we constructed T2VEval-Bench, a multi-dimensional benchmark dataset for text-to-video quality evaluation, which contains 148 textual prompts and 1,783 videos generated by 13 T2V models. To ensure a comprehensive evaluation, we scored each video on four dimensions in the subjective experiment, which are overall impression, text-video consistency, realness, and technical quality. Based on T2VEval-Bench, we developed T2VEval, a multi-branch fusion scheme for T2V quality evaluation. T2VEval assesses videos across three branches: text-video consistency, realness, and technical quality. Using an attention-based fusion module, T2VEval effectively integrates features from each branch and predicts scores with the aid of a large language model. Additionally, we implemented a divide-and-conquer training strategy, enabling each branch to learn targeted knowledge while maintaining synergy with the others. Experimental results demonstrate that T2VEval achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2025.

Builds on

43 of 65 references.

References · 43

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2023Stable Video Diffusion: Scaling Latent Video Diffusion Models to Large Datasetscited by 2,526
  6. 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,385
  7. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  8. 2022Imagen Video: High Definition Video Generation with Diffusion Modelscited by 1,765
  9. 2023VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 1,755
  10. 2022Make-A-Video: Text-to-Video Generation without Text-Video Datacited by 1,725
  11. 2022CogVideo: Large-scale Pretraining for Text-to-Video Generation via Transformerscited by 973
  12. 2023Text2Video-Zero: Text-to-Image Diffusion Models are Zero-Shot Video Generatorscited by 666
31 more
  1. 2023ModelScope Text-to-Video Technical Reportcited by 651
  2. 2023Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levelscited by 489
  3. 2022MagicVideo: Efficient Video Generation With Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 463
  4. 2022Latent Video Diffusion Models for High-Fidelity Long Video Generationcited by 385
  5. 2023EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Modelscited by 332
  6. 2023VideoFusion: Decomposed Diffusion Models for High-Quality Video Generationcited by 330
  7. 2023Show-1: Marrying Pixel and Latent Diffusion Models for Text-to-Video Generationcited by 300
  8. 2021GODIVA: Generating Open-DomaIn Videos from nAtural Descriptionscited by 254
  9. 2021N"UWA: Visual Synthesis Pre-training for Neural visUal World creAtioncited by 253
  10. 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
  11. 2022FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Samplingcited by 179
  12. 2024T2V-CompBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-video Generationcited by 177
  13. 2023Q-Instruct: Improving Low-level Visual Abilities for Multi-modality Foundation Modelscited by 152
  14. 2022A Deep Learning based No-reference Quality Assessment Model for UGC Videoscited by 128
  15. 2018Large-Scale Study of Perceptual Video Qualitycited by 127
  16. 2019YouTube UGC Dataset for Video Compression Researchcited by 124
  17. 2023FETV: A Benchmark for Fine-Grained Evaluation of Open-Domain Text-to-Video Generationcited by 119
  18. 2021Blindly Assess Quality of In-the-Wild Videos via Quality-aware Pre-training and Motion Perceptioncited by 97
  19. 2024Towards Open-ended Visual Quality Comparisoncited by 85
  20. 2024DeMamba: AI-Generated Video Detection on Million-Scale GenVideo Benchmarkcited by 85
  21. 2024Evaluation of Text-to-Video Generation Models: A Dynamics Perspectivecited by 66
  22. 2024T2VSafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Text-to-Video Generative Modelscited by 66
  23. 2023A Recipe for Scaling up Text-to-Video Generation with Text-free Videoscited by 51
  24. 2024Towards A Better Metric for Text-to-Video Generationcited by 50
  25. 2024Perceptual Video Quality Assessment: A Surveycited by 43
  26. 2024TC-Bench: Benchmarking Temporal Compositionality in Text-to-Video and Image-to-Video Generationcited by 42
  27. 2024GAIA: Rethinking Action Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Videoscited by 30
  28. 2023Measuring the Quality of Text-to-Video Model Outputs: Metrics and Datasetcited by 23
  29. 2024Quality Assessment for AI Generated Images with Instruction Tuningcited by 13
  30. 2024Exploring Rich Subjective Quality Information for Image Quality Assessment in the Wildcited by 13
  31. 2024Rethinking Human Evaluation Protocol for Text-to-Video Models: Enhancing Reliability,Reproducibility, and Practicalitycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.