mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fine-Grained Anomaly Perception in Wild UGC-Enhanced Images: A Comprehensive Dataset and Difference-Fusion Framework

arXiv 2609.02529 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image enhancement and restoration have become standard back-end operations on short-video and social media platforms to boost UGC visual experience. Yet these processes inevitably introduce visual anomalies--especially in faces, texts, and textures--that directly undermine perceptual fidelity and viewer trust. While existing IQA methods perform well on classic distortions, they target holistic quality assessment and fail to capture the specific, localized anomalies caused by enhancement algorithms in real-world UGC. To bridge this gap, we formally define a new task-quality Anomaly Perception for UGC image Enhancement (UEAP), and contribute the first UEAP benchmark dataset, named UEAP-4k, curated from the real business scenarios. It provides fine-grained annotations for anomaly categories, localization and severity levels. Furthermore, we propose a Difference-Fusion Anomaly Perception Method (DFAP-UGC) for wild UGC-enhanced images, which leverages explicit problem-reference difference fusion with dense spatial querying, regional verification, and quality-aware ranking, enabling robust anomaly identification in challenging scenarios. To handle the inherent coupling of subtasks in this new task, we propose a Locality-Aware Dynamic Task Prioritization (LADTP) training strategy that enables effective end-to-end learning and eliminates multi-stage overhead. Extensive experiments show that our method outperforms baselines adapted from classical approaches for this task, validating the value of this dataset and the superior of DFAP-UGC for robust UGC-enhanced image anomaly perception. Code and data will be public.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

Builds on

23 of 46 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  6. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  7. 2019Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and A Loss for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 1,361
  8. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 974
  9. 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 772
  10. 2020PaDiM: a Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 591
  11. 2021DRAEM -- A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detectioncited by 510
  12. 2022Anomaly Detection via Reverse Distillation from One-Class Embeddingcited by 419
11 more
  1. 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 276
  2. 2022A Unified Model for Multi-class Anomaly Detectioncited by 267
  3. 2021TOOD: Task-aligned One-stage Object Detectioncited by 218
  4. 2023Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 147
  5. 2023Re-IQA: Unsupervised Learning for Image Quality Assessment in the Wildcited by 97
  6. 2024A Survey on Visual Anomaly Detection: Challenge, Approach, and Prospectcited by 69
  7. 2019Learning a No-Reference Quality Assessment Model of Enhanced Images With Big Datacited by 21
  8. 2021Task-Specific Normalization for Continual Learning of Blind Image Quality Modelscited by 18
  9. 2024PromptIQA: Boosting the Performance and Generalization for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Promptscited by 14
  10. 2024Quality Assessment for AI Generated Images with Instruction Tuningcited by 13
  11. 2021Debiased Subjective Assessment of Real-World Image Enhancementcited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.