mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Delve into Base-Novel Confusion: Redundancy Exploration for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning

arXiv 2405.04918 ↗First posted 8 May 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Few-shot class-incremental learning (FSCIL) aims to acquire knowledge from novel classes with limited samples while retaining information about base classes. Existing methods address catastrophic forgetting and overfitting by freezing the feature extractor during novel-class learning. However, these methods usually tend to cause the confusion between base and novel classes, i.e., classifying novel-class samples into base classes. In this paper, we delve into this phenomenon to study its cause and solution. We first interpret the confusion as the collision between the novel-class and the base-class region in the feature space. Then, we find the collision is caused by the label-irrelevant redundancies within the base-class feature and pixel space. Through qualitative and quantitative experiments, we identify this redundancy as the shortcut in the base-class training, which can be decoupled to alleviate the collision. Based on this analysis, to alleviate the collision between base and novel classes, we propose a method for FSCIL named Redundancy Decoupling and Integration (RDI). RDI first decouples redundancies from base-class space to shrink the intra-base-class feature space. Then, it integrates the redundancies as a dummy class to enlarge the inter-base-class feature space. This process effectively compresses the base-class feature space, creating buffer space for novel classes and alleviating the model's confusion between the base and novel classes. Extensive experiments across benchmark datasets, including CIFAR-100, miniImageNet, and CUB-200-2011 demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2024.

Builds on

18 of 28 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  2. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
  3. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
  4. 2017Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learningcited by 1,143
  5. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
  6. 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 944
  7. 2019Large Scale Incremental Learningcited by 732
  8. 2019A Closer Look at Few-shot Classificationcited by 684
  9. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 582
  10. 2020Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learningcited by 251
  11. 2021Few-Shot Incremental Learning with Continually Evolved Classifierscited by 187
  12. 2022Forward Compatible Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learningcited by 127
6 more
  1. 2023Neural Collapse Inspired Feature-Classifier Alignment for Few-Shot Class Incremental Learningcited by 116
  2. 2021Self-Promoted Prototype Refinement for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learningcited by 96
  3. 2022Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning by Sampling Multi-Phase Taskscited by 88
  4. 2022Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning from an Open-Set Perspectivecited by 84
  5. 2022Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning via Entropy-Regularized Data-Free Replaycited by 72
  6. 2023Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning via Training-Free Prototype Calibrationcited by 46

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.