mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Reliable Detection of LLM-Generated Texts: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework with CUDRT

arXiv 2406.09056 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing prevalence of large language models (LLMs) has significantly advanced text generation, but the human-like quality of LLM outputs presents major challenges in reliably distinguishing between human-authored and LLM-generated texts. Existing detection benchmarks are constrained by their reliance on static datasets, scenario-specific tasks (e.g., question answering and text refinement), and a primary focus on English, overlooking the diverse linguistic and operational subtleties of LLMs. To address these gaps, we propose CUDRT, a comprehensive evaluation framework and bilingual benchmark in Chinese and English, categorizing LLM activities into five key operations: Create, Update, Delete, Rewrite, and Translate. CUDRT provides extensive datasets tailored to each operation, featuring outputs from state-of-the-art LLMs to assess the reliability of LLM-generated text detectors. This framework supports scalable, reproducible experiments and enables in-depth analysis of how operational diversity, multilingual training sets, and LLM architectures influence detection performance. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the framework's capacity to optimize detection systems, providing critical insights to enhance reliability, cross-linguistic adaptability, and detection accuracy. By advancing robust methodologies for identifying LLM-generated texts, this work contributes to the development of intelligent systems capable of meeting real-world multilingual detection challenges. Source code and dataset are available at GitHub.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2024.

Builds on

32 of 50 references.

References · 32

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  5. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  6. 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 670
  7. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
  8. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
  9. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
  10. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
  11. 2023Using an LLM to Help With Code Understandingcited by 228
  12. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
20 more
  1. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 190
  2. 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 163
  3. 2021Recent Advances in Deep Learning Based Dialogue Systems: A Systematic Surveycited by 130
  4. 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 71
  5. 2023RewriteLM: An Instruction-Tuned Large Language Model for Text Rewritingcited by 67
  6. 2023Contrasting Linguistic Patterns in Human and LLM-Generated News Textcited by 62
  7. 2022On the Blind Spots of Model-Based Evaluation Metrics for Text Generationcited by 49
  8. 2024LLM-as-a-Coauthor: Can Mixed Human-Written and Machine-Generated Text Be Detected?cited by 49
  9. 2023VISAR: A Human-AI Argumentative Writing Assistant with Visual Programming and Rapid Draft Prototypingcited by 46
  10. 2023ArguGPT: evaluating, understanding and identifying argumentative essays generated by GPT modelscited by 42
  11. 2023HC3 Plus: A Semantic-Invariant Human ChatGPT Comparison Corpuscited by 35
  12. 2023ChatGraph: Interpretable Text Classification by Converting ChatGPT Knowledge to Graphscited by 27
  13. 2024Who Wrote This? The Key to Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Text Detection Is GECScorecited by 27
  14. 2024Stumbling Blocks: Stress Testing the Robustness of Machine-Generated Text Detectors Under Attackscited by 26
  15. 2023To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question!cited by 20
  16. 2023Can Large Language Models Provide Security & Privacy Advice? Measuring the Ability of LLMs to Refute Misconceptionscited by 20
  17. 2024Spotting AI's Touch: Identifying LLM-Paraphrased Spans in Textcited by 16
  18. 2023Is ChatGPT Involved in Texts? Measure the Polish Ratio to Detect ChatGPT-Generated Textcited by 15
  19. 2021What Can Knowledge Bring to Machine Learning? -- A Survey of Low-shot Learning for Structured Datacited by 10
  20. 2024Hidding the Ghostwriters: An Adversarial Evaluation of AI-Generated Student Essay Detectioncited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.