mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Retrieval-Augmented Task Adaptation for Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2405.01468 ↗First posted 2 May 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 10

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Document understanding and multimodal RAG

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-trained contrastive vision-language models have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks. However, they often struggle on fine-trained datasets with categories not adequately represented during pre-training, which makes adaptation necessary. Recent works have shown promising results by utilizing samples from web-scale databases for retrieval-augmented adaptation, especially in low-data regimes. Despite the empirical success, understanding how retrieval impacts the adaptation of vision-language models remains an open research question. In this work, we adopt a reflective perspective by presenting a systematic study to understand the roles of key components in retrieval-augmented adaptation. We unveil new insights on uni-modal and cross-modal retrieval and highlight the critical role of logit ensemble for effective adaptation. We further present theoretical underpinnings that directly support our empirical observations.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Document understanding and multimodal RAG, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 42 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2024.

Builds on

42 of 56 references.

References · 42

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  4. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  5. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  6. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  7. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
  8. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
  9. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  10. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,427
  11. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
  12. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,021
30 more
  1. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 786
  2. 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 607
  3. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 572
  4. 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
  5. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
  6. 2021Supervision Exists Everywhere: A Data Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training Paradigmcited by 405
  7. 2022Tip-Adapter: Training-free Adaption of CLIP for Few-shot Classificationcited by 355
  8. 2023Demystifying CLIP Datacited by 265
  9. 2022What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classificationcited by 263
  10. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  11. 2022Prompt Distribution Learningcited by 235
  12. 2022Unified Contrastive Learning in Image-Text-Label Spacecited by 194
  13. 2023Prompt, Generate, then Cache: Cascade of Foundation Models makes Strong Few-shot Learnerscited by 152
  14. 2021What Makes Multi-modal Learning Better than Single (Provably)cited by 151
  15. 2022ELEVATER: A Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Language-Augmented Visual Modelscited by 141
  16. 2022Neural Prompt Searchcited by 133
  17. 2022Task Residual for Tuning Vision-Language Modelscited by 122
  18. 2022SuS-X: Training-Free Name-Only Transfer of Vision-Language Modelscited by 118
  19. 2022Retrieval Augmented Classification for Long-Tail Visual Recognitioncited by 106
  20. 2021CLOOB: Modern Hopfield Networks with InfoLOOB Outperform CLIPcited by 88
  21. 2022Understanding and Improving Visual Prompting: A Label-Mapping Perspectivecited by 86
  22. 2022K-LITE: Learning Transferable Visual Models with External Knowledgecited by 79
  23. 2017Sub-sampled Cubic Regularization for Non-convex Optimizationcited by 63
  24. 2023Learning Customized Visual Models with Retrieval-Augmented Knowledgecited by 58
  25. 2023Understanding Multimodal Contrastive Learning and Incorporating Unpaired Datacited by 43
  26. 2021Improved Fine-Tuning by Better Leveraging Pre-Training Datacited by 36
  27. 2023Retrieval-Enhanced Contrastive Vision-Text Modelscited by 36
  28. 2023Learning Visual Representations via Language-Guided Samplingcited by 32
  29. 2023Understanding Transferable Representation Learning and Zero-shot Transfer in CLIPcited by 26
  30. 2023Coreset Sampling from Open-Set for Fine-Grained Self-Supervised Learningcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026When Does Retrieval Help? A Study of In-Context Adaptation in Vision-Language-Action Models
  2. 2025Adapting Vision-Language Models Without Labels: A Comprehensive Survey
  3. 2024RAVEN: Multitask Retrieval Augmented Vision-Language Learning
  4. 2026To Adapt or Not to Adapt? Selective Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025QueryAdapter: Rapid Adaptation of Vision-Language Models in Response to Natural Language Queries
  6. 2024RoRA-VLM: Robust Retrieval-Augmented Vision Language Models
  7. 2025mRAG: Elucidating the Design Space of Multi-modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  8. 2026Understanding Cross-Modal Contributions in Continual Vision-Language Models: A Theoretical Perspective