mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

History-Guided Iterative Visual Reasoning with Self-Correction

arXiv 2602.04413 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.MMcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Self-consistency methods are the core technique for improving the reasoning reliability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs). By generating multiple reasoning results through repeated sampling and selecting the best answer via voting, they play an important role in cross-modal tasks. However, most existing self-consistency methods are limited to a fixed ``repeated sampling and voting'' paradigm and do not reuse historical reasoning information. As a result, models struggle to actively correct visual understanding errors and dynamically adjust their reasoning during iteration. Inspired by the human reasoning behavior of repeated verification and dynamic error correction, we propose the H-GIVR framework. During iterative reasoning, the MLLM observes the image multiple times and uses previously generated answers as references for subsequent steps, enabling dynamic correction of errors and improving answer accuracy. We conduct comprehensive experiments on five datasets and three models. The results show that the H-GIVR framework can significantly improve cross-modal reasoning accuracy while maintaining low computational cost. For instance, using textttLlama3.2-vision:11b on the ScienceQA dataset, the model requires an average of 2.57 responses per question to achieve an accuracy of 78.90%, representing a 107% improvement over the baseline.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.

Builds on

13 of 31 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  3. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  4. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  5. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,719
  6. 2024Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learningcited by 426
  7. 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 388
  8. 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRscited by 377
  9. 2025Rethinking Reflection in Pre-Trainingcited by 43
  10. 2025S2R: Teaching LLMs to Self-verify and Self-correct via Reinforcement Learningcited by 39
  11. 2024Core Knowledge Deficits in Multi-Modal Language Modelscited by 38
  12. 2024Understanding Retrieval-Augmented Task Adaptation for Vision-Language Modelscited by 10
1 more
  1. 2025Bootstrapping Task Spaces for Self-Improvementcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Towards Self-Refinement of Vision-Language Models with Triangular Consistency
  2. 2026Be Consistent! Enhancing Robust Visual Reasoning in LVLMs with Consistency Constraints
  3. 2025Sherlock: Self-Correcting Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025VFaith: Do Large Multimodal Models Really Reason on Seen Images Rather than Previous Memories?
  5. 2025Coherent Multimodal Reasoning with Iterative Self-Evaluation for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Vision-Language Models Can Self-Improve Reasoning via Reflection
  7. 2026Learn to Think: Improving Multimodal Reasoning through Vision-Aware Self-Improvement Training
  8. 2026When to Rethink: Learning Multi-Perspective Self-Verification for Vision-Language Models