How Can I Get It Right? Using GPT to Rephrase Incorrect Trainee Responses
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One-on-one tutoring is widely acknowledged as an effective instructional method, conditioned on qualified tutors. However, the high demand for qualified tutors remains a challenge, often necessitating the training of novice tutors (i.e., trainees) to ensure effective tutoring. Research suggests that providing timely explanatory feedback can facilitate the training process for trainees. However, it presents challenges due to the time-consuming nature of assessing trainee performance by human experts. Inspired by the recent advancements of large language models (LLMs), our study employed the GPT-4 model to build an explanatory feedback system. This system identifies trainees' responses in binary form (i.e., correct/incorrect) and automatically provides template-based feedback with responses appropriately rephrased by the GPT-4 model. We conducted our study on 410 responses from trainees across three training lessons: Giving Effective Praise, Reacting to Errors, and Determining What Students Know. Our findings indicate that: 1) using a few-shot approach, the GPT-4 model effectively identifies correct/incorrect trainees' responses from three training lessons with an average F1 score of 0.84 and an AUC score of 0.85; and 2) using the few-shot approach, the GPT-4 model adeptly rephrases incorrect trainees' responses into desired responses, achieving performance comparable to that of human experts.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2024.
Builds on
12 of 40 references.
References · 12
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
- 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 755
- 2019Generalizing from a Few Examples: A Survey on Few-Shot Learningcited by 462
- 2020A Review of Generalized Zero-Shot Learning Methodscited by 159
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of the Number of Shots in Few-Shot Learningcited by 39
- 2023Retrieval-augmented Generation to Improve Math Question-Answering: Trade-offs Between Groundedness and Human Preferencecited by 37
- 2023Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve through Interactive Demonstrationscited by 26
- 2023Automated Distractor and Feedback Generation for Math Multiple-choice Questions via In-context Learningcited by 24
- 2024How Can I Improve? Using GPT to Highlight the Desired and Undesired Parts of Open-ended Responsescited by 10
- 2023Using Large Language Models to Provide Explanatory Feedback to Human Tutorscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2024Tutor CoPilot: A Human-AI Approach for Scaling Real-Time Expertisecited by 46
- 2024SPL: A Socratic Playground for Learning Powered by Large Language Modelcited by 9
- 2024Does Multiple Choice Have a Future in the Age of Generative AI? A Posttest-only RCTcited by 7
- 2024RAMO: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Enhancing MOOCs Recommendationscited by 6
- 2024Beyond Text-to-Text: An Overview of Multimodal and Generative Artificial Intelligence for Education Using Topic Modelingcited by 6
- 2024Do Tutors Learn from Equity Training and Can Generative AI Assess It?cited by 5
- 2025Augmenting Human-Annotated Training Data with Large Language Model Generation and Distillation in Open-Response Assessmentcited by 4
- 2025LLM-Generated Feedback Supports Learning If Learners Choose to Use Itcited by 4
- 2025Automated Bias Assessment in AI-Generated Educational Content Using CEAT Frameworkcited by 1
- 2025LLM-as-a-Grader: Practical Insights from Large Language Model for Short-Answer and Report Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026MisEdu-RAG: A Misconception-Aware Dual-Hypergraph RAG for Novice Math Teacherscited by 0
- 2026Controllable Spoken Dialogue Generation: An LLM-Driven Grading System for K-12 Non-Native English Learnerscited by 0
- 2026Controllable Spoken Dialogue Generation: An LLM-Driven Grading System for K-12 Non-Native English Learners24 Apr 2026
- 2026MisEdu-RAG: A Misconception-Aware Dual-Hypergraph RAG for Novice Math Teachers5 Apr 2026
- 2025LLM-as-a-Grader: Practical Insights from Large Language Model for Short-Answer and Report Evaluation13 Nov 2025
- 2025LLM-Generated Feedback Supports Learning If Learners Choose to Use It20 Jun 2025
- 2025Automated Bias Assessment in AI-Generated Educational Content Using CEAT Framework19 May 2025
- 2025Augmenting Human-Annotated Training Data with Large Language Model Generation and Distillation in Open-Response Assessment15 Jan 2025
- 2024Do Tutors Learn from Equity Training and Can Generative AI Assess It?15 Dec 2024
- 2024Does Multiple Choice Have a Future in the Age of Generative AI? A Posttest-only RCT13 Dec 2024
- 2024Tutor CoPilot: A Human-AI Approach for Scaling Real-Time Expertise3 Oct 2024
- 2024Beyond Text-to-Text: An Overview of Multimodal and Generative Artificial Intelligence for Education Using Topic Modeling24 Sep 2024
- 2024RAMO: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Enhancing MOOCs Recommendations6 Jul 2024
- 2024SPL: A Socratic Playground for Learning Powered by Large Language Model20 Jun 2024