Using Large Language Models to Provide Explanatory Feedback to Human Tutors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Research demonstrates learners engaging in the process of producing explanations to support their reasoning, can have a positive impact on learning. However, providing learners real-time explanatory feedback often presents challenges related to classification accuracy, particularly in domain-specific environments, containing situationally complex and nuanced responses. We present two approaches for supplying tutors real-time feedback within an online lesson on how to give students effective praise. This work-in-progress demonstrates considerable accuracy in binary classification for corrective feedback of effective, or effort-based (F1 score = 0.811), and ineffective, or outcome-based (F1 score = 0.350), praise responses. More notably, we introduce progress towards an enhanced approach of providing explanatory feedback using large language model-facilitated named entity recognition, which can provide tutors feedback, not only while engaging in lessons, but can potentially suggest real-time tutor moves. Future work involves leveraging large language models for data augmentation to improve accuracy, while also developing an explanatory feedback interface.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2023.
Builds on
6 of 24 references.
References · 6
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 409
- 2018A Survey on Deep Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 282
- 2022Automatic Short Math Answer Grading via In-context Meta-learningcited by 18
- 2022AUC Maximization for Low-Resource Named Entity Recognitioncited by 6
- 2023Robust Educational Dialogue Act Classifiers with Low-Resource and Imbalanced Datasetscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5.
6 papers.
- 2023Ruffle&Riley: Towards the Automated Induction of Conversational Tutoring Systemscited by 12
- 2024How Can I Get It Right? Using GPT to Rephrase Incorrect Trainee Responsescited by 12
- 2024Improving Assessment of Tutoring Practices using Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 11
- 2024How Can I Improve? Using GPT to Highlight the Desired and Undesired Parts of Open-ended Responsescited by 10
- 2024Large Language Models Meet User Interfaces: The Case of Provisioning Feedbackcited by 4
- 2024The Life Cycle of Large Language Models: A Review of Biases in Educationcited by 3
- 2024The Life Cycle of Large Language Models: A Review of Biases in Education3 Jun 2024
- 2024How Can I Get It Right? Using GPT to Rephrase Incorrect Trainee Responses2 May 2024
- 2024How Can I Improve? Using GPT to Highlight the Desired and Undesired Parts of Open-ended Responses1 May 2024
- 2024Large Language Models Meet User Interfaces: The Case of Provisioning Feedback17 Apr 2024
- 2024Improving Assessment of Tutoring Practices using Retrieval-Augmented Generation4 Feb 2024
- 2023Ruffle&Riley: Towards the Automated Induction of Conversational Tutoring Systems26 Sep 2023