Automated Bias Assessment in AI-Generated Educational Content Using CEAT Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) have transformed educational content creation, particularly in developing tutor training materials. However, biases embedded in AI-generated content--such as gender, racial, or national stereotypes--raise significant ethical and educational concerns. Despite the growing use of GenAI, systematic methods for detecting and evaluating such biases in educational materials remain limited. This study proposes an automated bias assessment approach that integrates the Contextualized Embedding Association Test with a prompt-engineered word extraction method within a Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework. We applied this method to AI-generated texts used in tutor training lessons. Results show a high alignment between the automated and manually curated word sets, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.993, indicating reliable and consistent bias assessment. Our method reduces human subjectivity and enhances fairness, scalability, and reproducibility in auditing GenAI-produced educational content.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.
Builds on
11 of 15 references.
References · 11
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
- 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 377
- 2019Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphologycited by 200
- 2020Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biasescited by 167
- 2023Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 148
- 2023A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Modelscited by 95
- 2023Fairness And Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, And Mitigation Strategiescited by 85
- 2024How Can I Get It Right? Using GPT to Rephrase Incorrect Trainee Responsescited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Exploring AI Text Generation, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Detection Technologies: a Comprehensive Overview
- 2025Benchmarking Educational LLMs with Analytics: A Case Study on Gender Bias in Feedback
- 2023Generative Artificial Intelligence in Learning Analytics: Contextualising Opportunities and Challenges through the Learning Analytics Cycle
- 2026Generative AI Feedback, English Writing and Teacher Rubrics: A Multiple-Case Study of CyberScholar ↗
- 2025Automated Generation of Curriculum-Aligned Multiple-Choice Questions for Malaysian Secondary Mathematics Using Generative AI
- 2025Evaluating the Effect of Retrieval Augmentation on Social Biases
- 2025A Peek Behind the Curtain: Using Step-Around Prompt Engineering to Identify Bias and Misinformation in GenAI Models
- 2024Battling Botpoop using GenAI for Higher Education: A Study of a Retrieval Augmented Generation Chatbots Impact on Learning