mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Learning-Based Traffic Forecasting

arXiv 2405.00456 ↗First posted 1 May 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models are widely used in traffic forecasting and have achieved state-of-the-art prediction accuracy. However, the black-box nature of those models makes the results difficult to interpret by users. This study aims to leverage an Explainable AI approach, counterfactual explanations, to enhance the explainability and usability of deep learning-based traffic forecasting models. Specifically, the goal is to elucidate relationships between various input contextual features and their corresponding predictions. We present a comprehensive framework that generates counterfactual explanations for traffic forecasting and provides usable insights through the proposed scenario-driven counterfactual explanations. The study first implements a deep learning model to predict traffic speed based on historical traffic data and contextual variables. Counterfactual explanations are then used to illuminate how alterations in these input variables affect predicted outcomes, thereby enhancing the transparency of the deep learning model. We investigated the impact of contextual features on traffic speed prediction under varying spatial and temporal conditions. The scenario-driven counterfactual explanations integrate two types of user-defined constraints, directional and weighting constraints, to tailor the search for counterfactual explanations to specific use cases. These tailored explanations benefit machine learning practitioners who aim to understand the model's learning mechanisms and domain experts who seek insights for real-world applications. The results showcase the effectiveness of counterfactual explanations in revealing traffic patterns learned by deep learning models, showing its potential for interpreting black-box deep learning models used for spatiotemporal predictions in general.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2024.

Builds on

25 of 52 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
  3. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  4. 2019Graph WaveNet for Deep Spatial-Temporal Graph Modelingcited by 820
  5. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  6. 2021Graph Neural Network for Traffic Forecasting: A Surveycited by 260
  7. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
  8. 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
  9. 2020Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanationscited by 157
  10. 2020Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning on Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 49
  11. 2017Diffusion Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network: Data-Driven Traffic Forecastingcited by 36
  12. 2019Generative Counterfactual Introspection for Explainable Deep Learningcited by 36
13 more
  1. 2022A Survey on Graph Counterfactual Explanations: Definitions, Methods, Evaluation, and Research Challengescited by 30
  2. 2018Deep Sequence Learning with Auxiliary Information for Traffic Predictioncited by 29
  3. 2021Towards Relatable Explainable AI with the Perceptual Processcited by 27
  4. 2020Explaining Data-Driven Decisions made by AI Systems: The Counterfactual Approachcited by 26
  5. 2020AST-GCN: Attribute-Augmented Spatiotemporal Graph Convolutional Network for Traffic Forecastingcited by 26
  6. 2021Counterfactual Explanations for Arbitrary Regression Modelscited by 22
  7. 2019Explaining Visual Models by Causal Attributioncited by 18
  8. 2020An Unsupervised Random Forest Clustering Technique for Automatic Traffic Scenario Categorizationcited by 13
  9. 2020Counterfactual Explanation Based on Gradual Construction for Deep Networkscited by 12
  10. 2022Vision Paper: Causal Inference for Interpretable and Robust Machine Learning in Mobility Analysiscited by 6
  11. 2014Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Time Series Predictioncited by 2
  12. 2022Deep Learning for Medical Imaging From Diagnosis Prediction to its Counterfactual Explanationcited by 1
  13. 2023Counterfactual Graph Transformer for Traffic Flow Predictioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.