T-Explainer: A Model-Agnostic Explainability Framework Based on Gradients
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The development of machine learning applications has increased significantly in recent years, motivated by the remarkable ability of learning-powered systems to discover and generalize intricate patterns hidden in massive datasets. Modern learning models, while powerful, often exhibit a complexity level that renders them opaque black boxes, lacking transparency and hindering our understanding of their decision-making processes. Opacity challenges the practical application of machine learning, especially in critical domains requiring informed decisions. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) addresses that challenge, unraveling the complexity of black boxes by providing explanations. Feature attribution/importance XAI stands out for its ability to delineate the significance of input features in predictions. However, most attribution methods have limitations, such as instability, when divergent explanations result from similar or the same instance. This work introduces T-Explainer, a novel additive attribution explainer based on the Taylor expansion that offers desirable properties such as local accuracy and consistency. We demonstrate T-Explainer's effectiveness and stability over multiple runs in quantitative benchmark experiments against well-known attribution methods. Additionally, we provide several tools to evaluate and visualize explanations, turning T-Explainer into a comprehensive XAI framework.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2024.
Builds on
42 of 79 references.
References · 42
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
- 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
- 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 526
- 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
30 more
- 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 404
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 365
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
- 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 302
- 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 297
- 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 285
- 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
- 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 211
- 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 208
- 2022The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 159
- 2020Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley Value Estimation via Linear Regressioncited by 154
- 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
- 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 126
- 2020Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learningcited by 99
- 2019Benchmarking Attribution Methods with Relative Feature Importancecited by 89
- 2019Unrestricted Permutation forces Extrapolation: Variable Importance Requires at least One More Model, or There Is No Free Variable Importancecited by 87
- 2018Visualizing the Feature Importance for Black Box Modelscited by 55
- 2022Rethinking Stability for Attribution-based Explanationscited by 52
- 2020Robust and Stable Black Box Explanationscited by 47
- 2018Beyond One-hot Encoding: lower dimensional target embeddingcited by 43
- 2022Fairness via Explanation Quality: Evaluating Disparities in the Quality of Post hoc Explanationscited by 40
- 2021Explaining a Series of Models by Propagating Shapley Valuescited by 37
- 2020Feature Importance Ranking for Deep Learningcited by 31
- 2019Explaining Models by Propagating Shapley Values of Local Componentscited by 29
- 2021To trust or not to trust an explanation: using LEAF to evaluate local linear XAI methodscited by 26
- 2019A Human-Grounded Evaluation of SHAP for Alert Processingcited by 23
- 2018Considerations When Learning Additive Explanations for Black-Box Modelscited by 10
- 2016Nothing Else Matters: Model-Agnostic Explanations By Identifying Prediction Invariancecited by 9
- 2021A Survey on Methods and Metrics for the Assessment of Explainability under the Proposed AI Actcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Multi-criteria Rank-based Aggregation for Explainable AIcited by 0
- 2025Multi-criteria Rank-based Aggregation for Explainable AI30 May 2025