A Survey on Methods and Metrics for the Assessment of Explainability under the Proposed AI Act
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study discusses the interplay between metrics used to measure the explainability of the AI systems and the proposed EU Artificial Intelligence Act. A standardisation process is ongoing: several entities (e.g. ISO) and scholars are discussing how to design systems that are compliant with the forthcoming Act and explainability metrics play a significant role. This study identifies the requirements that such a metric should possess to ease compliance with the AI Act. It does so according to an interdisciplinary approach, i.e. by departing from the philosophical concept of explainability and discussing some metrics proposed by scholars and standardisation entities through the lenses of the explainability obligations set by the proposed AI Act. Our analysis proposes that metrics to measure the kind of explainability endorsed by the proposed AI Act shall be risk-focused, model-agnostic, goal-aware, intelligible & accessible. This is why we discuss the extent to which these requirements are met by the metrics currently under discussion.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2021.
Builds on
8 of 27 references.
References · 8
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
- 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 260
- 2021If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniquescited by 82
- 2020On quantitative aspects of model interpretabilitycited by 71
- 2019Measuring the Quality of Explanations: The System Causability Scale (SCS). Comparing Human and Machine Explanationscited by 64
- 2017Interpretable & Explorable Approximations of Black Box Modelscited by 54
- 2021An Objective Metric for Explainable AI: How and Why to Estimate the Degree of Explainabilitycited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulationcited by 61
- 2022What Makes a Good Explanation?: A Harmonized View of Properties of Explanationscited by 22
- 2025Robustness and Cybersecurity in the EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 11
- 2023Is Your Model "MADD"? A Novel Metric to Evaluate Algorithmic Fairness for Predictive Student Modelscited by 7
- 2024T-Explainer: A Model-Agnostic Explainability Framework Based on Gradientscited by 1
- 2024Aligning XAI with EU Regulations for Smart Biomedical Devices: A Methodology for Compliance Analysiscited by 1
- 2026Assessing Model-Agnostic XAI Methods against EU AI Act Explainability Requirementscited by 1
- 2024Design of a Quality Management System based on the EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 0
- 2026Assessing Model-Agnostic XAI Methods against EU AI Act Explainability Requirements19 Mar 2026
- 2025Robustness and Cybersecurity in the EU Artificial Intelligence Act22 Feb 2025
- 2024Aligning XAI with EU Regulations for Smart Biomedical Devices: A Methodology for Compliance Analysis27 Aug 2024
- 2024Design of a Quality Management System based on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act8 Aug 2024
- 2024T-Explainer: A Model-Agnostic Explainability Framework Based on Gradients25 Apr 2024
- 2023Is Your Model "MADD"? A Novel Metric to Evaluate Algorithmic Fairness for Predictive Student Models24 May 2023
- 2023Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulation2 May 2023
- 2022What Makes a Good Explanation?: A Harmonized View of Properties of Explanations10 Nov 2022