Quality-Aware Calibration for AI-Generated Image Detection in the Wild
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Significant progress has been made in detecting synthetic images, however most existing approaches operate on a single image instance and overlook a key characteristic of real-world dissemination: as viral images circulate on the web, multiple near-duplicate versions appear and lose quality due to repeated operations like recompression, resizing and cropping. As a consequence, the same image may yield inconsistent forensic predictions based on which version has been analyzed. In this work, to address this issue we propose QuAD (Quality-Aware calibration with near-Duplicates) a novel framework that makes decisions based on all available near-duplicates of the same image. Given a query, we retrieve its online near-duplicates and feed them to a detector: the resulting scores are then aggregated based on the estimated quality of the corresponding instance. By doing so, we take advantage of all pieces of information while accounting for the reduced reliability of images impaired by multiple processing steps. To support large-scale evaluation, we introduce two datasets: AncesTree, an in-lab dataset of 136k images organized in stochastic degradation trees that simulate online reposting dynamics, and ReWIND, a real-world dataset of nearly 10k near-duplicate images collected from viral web content. Experiments on several state-of-the-art detectors show that our quality-aware fusion improves their performance consistently, with an average gain of around 8% in terms of balanced accuracy compared to plain average. Our results highlight the importance of jointly processing all the images available online to achieve reliable detection of AI-generated content in real-world applications. Code and data are publicly available at https://grip-unina.github.io/QuAD/
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.
Builds on
19 of 30 references.
References · 19
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
- 2022On the detection of synthetic images generated by diffusion modelscited by 282
- 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 165
- 2024SIDA: Social Media Image Deepfake Detection, Localization and Explanation with Large Multimodal Modelcited by 107
- 2023Identifying and Mitigating the Security Risks of Generative AIcited by 90
- 2024Detecting Multimedia Generated by Large AI Models: A Surveycited by 73
- 2024A Bias-Free Training Paradigm for More General AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 67
- 2021Multimodal Image Synthesis and Editing: The Generative AI Eracited by 52
- 2024D3: Scaling Up Deepfake Detection by Learning from Discrepancycited by 43
- 2025CO-SPY: Combining Semantic and Pixel Features to Detect Synthetic Images by AIcited by 42
- 2024Contrasting Deepfakes Diffusion via Contrastive Learning and Global-Local Similaritiescited by 27
- 2024AMMeBa: A Large-Scale Survey and Dataset of Media-Based Misinformation In-The-Wildcited by 26
7 more
- 2025Bridging the Gap Between Ideal and Real-world Evaluation: Benchmarking AI-Generated Image Detection in Challenging Scenarioscited by 24
- 2024Synthetic Image Verification in the Era of Generative AI: What Works and What Isn't There Yetcited by 13
- 2024AI-Generated Faces in the Real World: A Large-Scale Case Study of Twitter Profile Imagescited by 10
- 2023Finding AI-Generated Faces in the Wildcited by 8
- 2024Evolution of Detection Performance throughout the Online Lifespan of Synthetic Imagescited by 8
- 2025TrueFake: A Real World Case Dataset of Last Generation Fake Images also Shared on Social Networkscited by 8
- 2025MIRAGE: Towards AI-Generated Image Detection in the Wildcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.