Training-Free Reconstruction-Based AI-Generated Image Detectors Are Inherently Vulnerable to Adversarial Examples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The impressive visual quality and ubiquity of AI-generated images call for reliable and robust detection methods. Reconstruction-based detectors have emerged as a promising direction for transparent and training-free identification of synthetic images. However, due to their fundamentally different mode of operation (compared to standard, classifier-based methods), little is known about their adversarial robustness. In this work, we propose two novel attack methods targeted at detectors that leverage autoencoder reconstruction error. We find that by constructing imperceptible adversarial examples, the distance between original and reconstruction can be artificially increased, causing fake images to be wrongly classified as real. Our evaluation including images from three state-of-the-art generators and three detectors demonstrates that detection performance is significantly decreased, even if attacked images additionally undergo real-world degradations. Critically, our adversarial examples naturally transfer across detectors, as they all share the same principle, pointing towards an inherent vulnerability of reconstruction-based detectors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.
Builds on
24 of 36 references.
References · 24
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2025FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Spacecited by 960
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 483
- 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 386
- 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
- 2024AEROBLADE: Training-Free Detection of Latent Diffusion Images Using Autoencoder Reconstruction Errorcited by 123
12 more
- 2024Leveraging Representations from Intermediate Encoder-blocks for Synthetic Image Detectioncited by 88
- 2020Evading Deepfake-Image Detectors with White- and Black-Box Attackscited by 80
- 2024FakeInversion: Learning to Detect Images from Unseen Text-to-Image Models by Inverting Stable Diffusioncited by 61
- 2020Exposing GAN-generated Faces Using Inconsistent Corneal Specular Highlightscited by 59
- 2021Eyes Tell All: Irregular Pupil Shapes Reveal GAN-generated Facescited by 48
- 2022Detecting GAN-generated Images by Orthogonal Training of Multiple CNNscited by 46
- 2020CNN Detection of GAN-Generated Face Images based on Cross-Band Co-occurrences Analysiscited by 42
- 2024Vulnerabilities in AI-generated Image Detection: The Challenge of Adversarial Attackscited by 12
- 2024Exploring the Adversarial Robustness of CLIP for AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 11
- 2024AI-Generated Faces in the Real World: A Large-Scale Case Study of Twitter Profile Imagescited by 10
- 2024HFI: A unified framework for training-free detection and implicit watermarking of latent diffusion model generated imagescited by 9
- 2024Adversarial Robustness of AI-Generated Image Detectors in the Real Worldcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.