Uncertain Boundaries: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Copyright Issues in Generative AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative AI is becoming increasingly prevalent in creative fields, sparking urgent debates over how current copyright laws can keep pace with technological innovation. Recent controversies of AI models generating near-replicas of copyrighted material highlight the need to adapt current legal frameworks and develop technical methods to mitigate copyright infringement risks. This task requires understanding the intersection between computational concepts such as large-scale data scraping and probabilistic content generation, legal definitions of originality and fair use, and economic impacts on IP rights holders. However, most existing research on copyright in AI takes a purely computer science or law-based approach, leaving a gap in coordinating these approaches that only multidisciplinary efforts can effectively address. To bridge this gap, our survey adopts a comprehensive approach synthesizing insights from law, policy, economics, and computer science. It begins by discussing the foundational goals and considerations that should be applied to copyright in generative AI, followed by methods for detecting and assessing potential violations in AI system outputs. Next, it explores various regulatory options influenced by legal, policy, and economic frameworks to manage and mitigate copyright concerns associated with generative AI and reconcile the interests of IP rights holders with that of generative AI producers. The discussion then introduces techniques to safeguard individual creative works from unauthorized replication, such as watermarking and cryptographic protections. Finally, it describes advanced training strategies designed to prevent AI models from reproducing protected content. In doing so, we highlight key opportunities for action and offer actionable strategies that creators, developers, and policymakers can use in navigating the evolving copyright landscape.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 188 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2024.
Builds on
47 of 188 references.
References · 47
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 710
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
- 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 247
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPTcited by 221
- 2023Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry by Text-to-Image Modelscited by 200
- 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 169
- 2023Adversarial Example Does Good: Preventing Painting Imitation from Diffusion Models via Adversarial Examplescited by 163
- 2019Robust Invisible Video Watermarking with Attentioncited by 144
- 2023Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation: Small Models Can Also "Think" Step-by-Stepcited by 144
- 2023Invisible Image Watermarks Are Provably Removable Using Generative AIcited by 124
- 2024Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Auditscited by 123
35 more
- 2022Foundations and Trends in Multimodal Machine Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 116
- 2023Foundation Models and Fair Usecited by 112
- 2023ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI modelscited by 85
- 2023The Data Provenance Initiative: A Large Scale Audit of Dataset Licensing & Attribution in AIcited by 73
- 2022Do Language Models Plagiarize?cited by 72
- 2019FAHT: An Adaptive Fairness-aware Decision Tree Classifiercited by 63
- 2023Talkin' 'Bout AI Generation: Copyright and the Generative-AI Supply Chaincited by 45
- 2023Perceptual Artifacts Localization for Image Synthesis Taskscited by 43
- 2023Small Models are Valuable Plug-ins for Large Language Modelscited by 42
- 2024AI auditing: The Broken Bus on the Road to AI Accountabilitycited by 42
- 2021FARF: A Fair and Adaptive Random Forests Classifiercited by 37
- 2024Copyright Traps for Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2024Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Technical Perspectivecited by 35
- 2024History, Development, and Principles of Large Language Models-An Introductory Surveycited by 30
- 2020Disentangled Dynamic Graph Deep Generationcited by 27
- 2022The Dataset Nutrition Label (2nd Gen): Leveraging Context to Mitigate Harms in Artificial Intelligencecited by 26
- 2023How to Protect Copyright Data in Optimization of Large Language Models?cited by 26
- 2018A Deterministic Self-Organizing Map Approach and its Application on Satellite Data based Cloud Type Classificationcited by 22
- 2022Longitudinal Fairness with Censorshipcited by 21
- 2022Fairness Amidst Non-IID Graph Data: A Literature Reviewcited by 20
- 2022A Benchmark Corpus for the Detection of Automatically Generated Text in Academic Publicationscited by 18
- 2022Serving Deep Learning Models with Deduplication from Relational Databasescited by 15
- 2023Fair Decision-making Under Uncertaintycited by 15
- 2023Copyright Protection and Accountability of Generative AI:Attack, Watermarking and Attributioncited by 15
- 2023Towards Fair Machine Learning Software: Understanding and Addressing Model Bias Through Counterfactual Thinkingcited by 14
- 2021Interpretable Visual Understanding with Cognitive Attention Networkcited by 12
- 2023Preventing Discriminatory Decision-making in Evolving Data Streamscited by 12
- 2023Individual Fairness under Uncertaintycited by 11
- 2023DeepfakeArt Challenge: A Benchmark Dataset for Generative AI Art Forgery and Data Poisoning Detectioncited by 9
- 2022Incremental Mining of Frequent Serial Episodes Considering Multiple Occurrencescited by 7
- 2023DECORAIT -- DECentralized Opt-in/out Registry for AI Trainingcited by 7
- 2023Privacy and Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Lifecycle Perspectivecited by 6
- 2023CopyScope: Model-level Copyright Infringement Quantification in the Diffusion Workflowcited by 3
- 2024Generative Deduplication For Socia Media Data Selectioncited by 2
- 2024MUGC: Machine Generated versus User Generated Content Detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.