Structured Gradient-based Interpretations via Norm-Regularized Adversarial Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gradient-based saliency maps have been widely used to explain the decisions of deep neural network classifiers. However, standard gradient-based interpretation maps, including the simple gradient and integrated gradient algorithms, often lack desired structures such as sparsity and connectedness in their application to real-world computer vision models. A frequently used approach to inducing sparsity structures into gradient-based saliency maps is to alter the simple gradient scheme using sparsification or norm-based regularization. A drawback with such post-processing methods is their frequently-observed significant loss in fidelity to the original simple gradient map. In this work, we propose to apply adversarial training as an in-processing scheme to train neural networks with structured simple gradient maps. We show a duality relation between the regularized norms of the adversarial perturbations and gradient-based maps, based on which we design adversarial training loss functions promoting sparsity and group-sparsity properties in simple gradient maps. We present several numerical results to show the influence of our proposed norm-based adversarial training methods on the standard gradient-based maps of standard neural network architectures on benchmark image datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2024.
Builds on
32 of 45 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
20 more
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
- 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 528
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
- 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 419
- 2017Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 401
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
- 2018Deep Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 276
- 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
- 2017Interpretable Learning for Self-Driving Cars by Visualizing Causal Attentioncited by 107
- 2022Harmonizing the object recognition strategies of deep neural networks with humanscited by 59
- 2021Do Input Gradients Highlight Discriminative Features?cited by 52
- 2019Certifiably Robust Interpretation in Deep Learningcited by 35
- 2019Why are Saliency Maps Noisy? Cause of and Solution to Noisy Saliency Mapscited by 34
- 2019Bridging Adversarial Robustness and Gradient Interpretabilitycited by 22
- 2021Human Attention in Fine-grained Classificationcited by 21
- 2020Quantifying Explainability of Saliency Methods in Deep Neural Networks with a Synthetic Datasetcited by 14
- 2023On the Impact of Knowledge Distillation for Model Interpretabilitycited by 8
- 2023MoreauGrad: Sparse and Robust Interpretation of Neural Networks via Moreau Envelopecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2025MIRAGE: Towards AI-Generated Image Detection in the Wildcited by 8
- 2025Sparsity Forcing: Reinforcing Token Sparsity of MLLMscited by 3
- 2024Gaussian Smoothing in Saliency Maps: The Stability-Fidelity Trade-Off in Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 1
- 2025Smaller is Better: Enhancing Transparency in Vehicle AI Systems via Pruningcited by 0
- 2026On the Fragility of AI-Based Channel Decoders under Small Channel Perturbationscited by 0
- 2026What Makes VLMs Robust? Towards Reconciling Robustness and Accuracy in Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Improving Adversarial Robustness of Attribution via Implicit Regularizationcited by 0
- 2026Improving Adversarial Robustness of Attribution via Implicit Regularization28 May 2026
- 2026What Makes VLMs Robust? Towards Reconciling Robustness and Accuracy in Vision-Language Models13 Mar 2026
- 2026On the Fragility of AI-Based Channel Decoders under Small Channel Perturbations2 Feb 2026
- 2025Smaller is Better: Enhancing Transparency in Vehicle AI Systems via Pruning24 Sep 2025
- 2025MIRAGE: Towards AI-Generated Image Detection in the Wild17 Aug 2025
- 2025Sparsity Forcing: Reinforcing Token Sparsity of MLLMs23 Apr 2025
- 2024Gaussian Smoothing in Saliency Maps: The Stability-Fidelity Trade-Off in Neural Network Interpretability6 Nov 2024