Gaussian Smoothing in Saliency Maps: The Stability-Fidelity Trade-Off in Neural Network Interpretability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Saliency maps have been widely used to interpret the decisions of neural network classifiers and discover phenomena from their learned functions. However, standard gradient-based maps are frequently observed to be highly sensitive to the randomness of training data and the stochasticity in the training process. In this work, we study the role of Gaussian smoothing in the well-known Smooth-Grad algorithm in the stability of the gradient-based maps to the randomness of training samples. We extend the algorithmic stability framework to gradient-based interpretation maps and prove bounds on the stability error of standard Simple-Grad, Integrated-Gradients, and Smooth-Grad saliency maps. Our theoretical results suggest the role of Gaussian smoothing in boosting the stability of gradient-based maps to the randomness of training settings. On the other hand, we analyze the faithfulness of the Smooth-Grad maps to the original Simple-Grad and show the lower fidelity under a more intense Gaussian smoothing. We support our theoretical results by performing several numerical experiments on standard image datasets. Our empirical results confirm our hypothesis on the fidelity-stability trade-off in the application of Gaussian smoothing to gradient-based interpretation maps.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2024.
Builds on
24 of 47 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
12 more
- 2013Speech Recognition with Deep Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 669
- 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 552
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 333
- 2021Improving Deep Learning Interpretability by Saliency Guided Trainingcited by 68
- 2019Certifiably Robust Interpretation in Deep Learningcited by 35
- 2019Why are Saliency Maps Noisy? Cause of and Solution to Noisy Saliency Mapscited by 34
- 2020How Good is your Explanation? Algorithmic Stability Measures to Assess the Quality of Explanations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 27
- 2022Scientific Inference With Interpretable Machine Learning: Analyzing Models to Learn About Real-World Phenomenacited by 21
- 2019Stein's Lemma for the Reparameterization Trick with Exponential Family Mixturescited by 18
- 2024Structured Gradient-based Interpretations via Norm-Regularized Adversarial Trainingcited by 7
- 2023MoreauGrad: Sparse and Robust Interpretation of Neural Networks via Moreau Envelopecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.