Improving Adversarial Robustness of Attribution via Implicit Regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The adversarial robustness of attributions is a fundamental requirement for reliable explainability in deep learning, yet existing approaches typically rely on computationally expensive explicit regularization. In this work, we show that attribution robustness can arise implicitly from the learning dynamics of standard stochastic gradient descent. We theoretically motivate this effect through connections between parameter-space and input-space curvature, and validate it across architectures, datasets, and attribution methods, with negligible computational overhead. In contrast, we prove that such robustness gains often does not transfer to attention-based attribution under softmax normalization, due to inherent entropy constraints, and we validate this limitation experimentally. Finally, we show that replacing softmax attention with kernel-based attention restores the robustness gains in transformer models. Our results highlight learning dynamics as a principled and practical mechanism for robust explainability, and reveal fundamental limitations of attention-based attribution under normalization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 85 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.
Builds on
85 of 105 references.
References · 85
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 2,022
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
38 more
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
- 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
- 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 427
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 389
- 2020Visual Transformers: Token-based Image Representation and Processing for Computer Visioncited by 334
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 333
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
- 2017Empirical Analysis of the Hessian of Over-Parametrized Neural Networkscited by 290
- 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
- 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 216
- 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 175
- 2020The Lipschitz Constant of Self-Attentioncited by 174
- 2023FLatten Transformer: Vision Transformer using Focused Linear Attentioncited by 171
- 2023Stabilizing Transformer Training by Preventing Attention Entropy Collapsecited by 161
- 2016Toward Deeper Understanding of Neural Networks: The Power of Initialization and a Dual View on Expressivitycited by 138
- 2018Activation Functions: Comparison of trends in Practice and Research for Deep Learningcited by 130
- 2019Robust Learning with Jacobian Regularizationcited by 129
- 2021Label Noise SGD Provably Prefers Flat Global Minimizerscited by 121
- 2019Sanity Checks for Saliency Metricscited by 119
- 2019Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulationcited by 112
- 2019Learning to Deceive with Attention-Based Explanationscited by 111
- 2022A Consistent and Efficient Evaluation Strategy for Attribution Methodscited by 102
- 2023ReLU Strikes Back: Exploiting Activation Sparsity in Large Language Modelscited by 94
- 2022Three things everyone should know about Vision Transformerscited by 90
- 2019Benchmarking Attribution Methods with Relative Feature Importancecited by 89
- 2021The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scorescited by 88
- 2019Measurements of Three-Level Hierarchical Structure in the Outliers in the Spectrum of Deepnet Hessianscited by 68
- 2024Understanding Optimization in Deep Learning with Central Flowscited by 64
- 2021On Linear Stability of SGD and Input-Smoothness of Neural Networkscited by 63
- 2022Analyzing Sharpness along GD Trajectory: Progressive Sharpening and Edge of Stabilitycited by 63
- 2020Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts Generalizationcited by 62
- 2021Stable, Fast and Accurate: Kernelized Attention with Relative Positional Encodingcited by 51
50 most cited of 85 All 85 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.