mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MANGO: A Benchmark for Evaluating Mapping and Navigation Abilities of Large Language Models

arXiv 2403.19913 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 have recently achieved astonishing performance on a variety of natural language processing tasks. In this paper, we propose MANGO, a benchmark to evaluate their capabilities to perform text-based mapping and navigation. Our benchmark includes 53 mazes taken from a suite of textgames: each maze is paired with a walkthrough that visits every location but does not cover all possible paths. The task is question-answering: for each maze, a large language model reads the walkthrough and answers hundreds of mapping and navigation questions such as "How should you go to Attic from West of House?" and "Where are we if we go north and east from Cellar?". Although these questions are easy to humans, it turns out that even GPT-4, the best-to-date language model, performs poorly at answering them. Further, our experiments suggest that a strong mapping and navigation ability would benefit large language models in performing relevant downstream tasks, such as playing textgames. Our MANGO benchmark will facilitate future research on methods that improve the mapping and navigation capabilities of language models. We host our leaderboard, data, code, and evaluation program at https://mango.ttic.edu and https://github.com/oaklight/mango/.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2024.

Builds on

55 of 67 references.

References · 55

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  6. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  7. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  8. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  9. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  10. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  11. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  12. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
38 more
  1. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  2. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  3. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  4. 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
  5. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
  6. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,037
  7. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  8. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  9. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  10. 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,172
  11. 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,057
  12. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
  13. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,029
  14. 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,013
  15. 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 983
  16. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
  17. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  18. 2023RWKV: Reinventing RNNs for the Transformer Eracited by 814
  19. 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 773
  20. 2018On Evaluation of Embodied Navigation Agentscited by 526
  21. 2022MineDojo: Building Open-Ended Embodied Agents with Internet-Scale Knowledgecited by 469
  22. 2022LM-Nav: Robotic Navigation with Large Pre-Trained Models of Language, Vision, and Actioncited by 435
  23. 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 417
  24. 2018VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities via Programscited by 411
  25. 2016Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Agecited by 405
  26. 2022Visual Language Maps for Robot Navigationcited by 362
  27. 2018Speaker-Follower Models for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 337
  28. 2021A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solverscited by 314
  29. 2023ChatGPT for Robotics: Design Principles and Model Abilitiescited by 296
  30. 2019Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 281
  31. 2019QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Compositioncited by 248
  32. 2022CoWs on Pasture: Baselines and Benchmarks for Language-Driven Zero-Shot Object Navigationcited by 194
  33. 2019Vision-Language Navigation with Self-Supervised Auxiliary Reasoning Taskscited by 177
  34. 2020Improving Vision-and-Language Navigation with Image-Text Pairs from the Webcited by 177
  35. 2019Interactive Fiction Games: A Colossal Adventurecited by 165
  36. 2023Foundation Models for Decision Making: Problems, Methods, and Opportunitiescited by 160
  37. 2021FILM: Following Instructions in Language with Modular Methodscited by 119
  38. 2015Listen, Attend, and Walk: Neural Mapping of Navigational Instructions to Action Sequencescited by 50

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 4.

9 papers.