mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Provably Secure Disambiguating Neural Linguistic Steganography

arXiv 2403.17524 ↗First posted 26 Mar 2024cs.CR cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent research in provably secure neural linguistic steganography has overlooked a crucial aspect: the sender must detokenize stegotexts to avoid raising suspicion from the eavesdropper. The segmentation ambiguity problem, which arises when using language models based on subwords, leads to occasional decoding failures in all neural language steganography implementations based on these models. Current solutions to this issue involve altering the probability distribution of candidate words, rendering them incompatible with provably secure steganography. We propose a novel secure disambiguation method named SyncPool, which effectively addresses the segmentation ambiguity problem. We group all tokens with prefix relationships in the candidate pool before the steganographic embedding algorithm runs to eliminate uncertainty among ambiguous tokens. To enable the receiver to synchronize the sampling process of the sender, a shared cryptographically-secure pseudorandom number generator (CSPRNG) is deployed to select a token from the ambiguity pool. SyncPool does not change the size of the candidate pool or the distribution of tokens and thus is applicable to provably secure language steganography methods. We provide theoretical proofs and experimentally demonstrate the applicability of our solution to various languages and models, showing its potential to significantly improve the reliability and security of neural linguistic steganography systems.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2024.

Builds on

21 of 46 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  6. 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
  7. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  8. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  9. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  10. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  11. 2021GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infillingcited by 1,031
  12. 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 670
9 more
  1. 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 639
  2. 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 530
  3. 2016Exploring the Limits of Language Modelingcited by 173
  4. 2019Neural Linguistic Steganographycited by 78
  5. 2017Generating Steganographic Text with LSTMscited by 44
  6. 2022Perfectly Secure Steganography Using Minimum Entropy Couplingcited by 44
  7. 2021Provably Secure Generative Linguistic Steganographycited by 34
  8. 2021Frustratingly Easy Edit-based Linguistic Steganography with a Masked Language Modelcited by 30
  9. 2022Addressing Segmentation Ambiguity in Neural Linguistic Steganographycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.