Addressing Segmentation Ambiguity in Neural Linguistic Steganography
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Previous studies on neural linguistic steganography, except Ueoka et al. (2021), overlook the fact that the sender must detokenize cover texts to avoid arousing the eavesdropper's suspicion. In this paper, we demonstrate that segmentation ambiguity indeed causes occasional decoding failures at the receiver's side. With the near-ubiquity of subwords, this problem now affects any language. We propose simple tricks to overcome this problem, which are even applicable to languages without explicit word boundaries.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2022.
Builds on
13 of 34 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
- 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 548
- 2019Neural Linguistic Steganographycited by 78
- 2017Generating Steganographic Text with LSTMscited by 44
- 2021Provably Secure Generative Linguistic Steganographycited by 34
- 2019Towards Near-imperceptible Steganographic Textcited by 32
- 2021Frustratingly Easy Edit-based Linguistic Steganography with a Masked Language Modelcited by 30
- 2020Near-imperceptible Neural Linguistic Steganography via Self-Adjusting Arithmetic Codingcited by 17
- 2022Semantic-Preserving Linguistic Steganography by Pivot Translation and Semantic-Aware Bins Codingcited by 7
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2024Provably Secure Disambiguating Neural Linguistic Steganographycited by 5
- 2025Addressing Tokenization Inconsistency in Steganography and Watermarking Based on Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2026Efficient Provably Secure Linguistic Steganography via Range Codingcited by 3
- 2026Anchored Sliding Window: Toward Robust and Imperceptible Linguistic Steganographycited by 2
- 2025A High-Capacity and Secure Disambiguation Algorithm for Neural Linguistic Steganographycited by 1
- 2026HiTMS: A High-Throughput Multi-Stream Linguistic Steganography Frameworkcited by 1
- 2026A Comprehensive Survey on Linguistic Steganography: Methods, Countermeasures, Evaluation, and Challengescited by 0
- 2026A Comprehensive Survey on Linguistic Steganography: Methods, Countermeasures, Evaluation, and Challenges29 Aug 2026
- 2026HiTMS: A High-Throughput Multi-Stream Linguistic Steganography Framework26 Jul 2026
- 2026Anchored Sliding Window: Toward Robust and Imperceptible Linguistic Steganography10 Apr 2026
- 2026Efficient Provably Secure Linguistic Steganography via Range Coding9 Apr 2026
- 2025A High-Capacity and Secure Disambiguation Algorithm for Neural Linguistic Steganography26 Sep 2025
- 2025Addressing Tokenization Inconsistency in Steganography and Watermarking Based on Large Language Models28 Aug 2025
- 2024Provably Secure Disambiguating Neural Linguistic Steganography26 Mar 2024