mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Skews in the Phenomenon Space Hinder Generalization in Text-to-Image Generation

arXiv 2403.16394 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The literature on text-to-image generation is plagued by issues of faithfully composing entities with relations. But there lacks a formal understanding of how entity-relation compositions can be effectively learned. Moreover, the underlying phenomenon space that meaningfully reflects the problem structure is not well-defined, leading to an arms race for larger quantities of data in the hope that generalization emerges out of large-scale pretraining. We hypothesize that the underlying phenomenological coverage has not been proportionally scaled up, leading to a skew of the presented phenomenon which harms generalization. We introduce statistical metrics that quantify both the linguistic and visual skew of a dataset for relational learning, and show that generalization failures of text-to-image generation are a direct result of incomplete or unbalanced phenomenological coverage. We first perform experiments in a synthetic domain and demonstrate that systematically controlled metrics are strongly predictive of generalization performance. Then we move to natural images and show that simple distribution perturbations in light of our theories boost generalization without enlarging the absolute data size. This work informs an important direction towards quality-enhancing the data diversity or balance orthogonal to scaling up the absolute size. Our discussions point out important open questions on 1) Evaluation of generated entity-relation compositions, and 2) Better models for reasoning with abstract relations.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2024.

Builds on

38 of 51 references.

References · 38

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  4. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  6. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
  7. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
  8. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  9. 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 6,054
  10. 2023Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 5,503
  11. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  12. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
26 more
  1. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  2. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  3. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  4. 2022Scaling Autoregressive Models for Content-Rich Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,295
  5. 2022Plug-and-Play Diffusion Features for Text-Driven Image-to-Image Translationcited by 906
  6. 2023GLIGEN: Open-Set Grounded Text-to-Image Generationcited by 781
  7. 2023Muse: Text-To-Image Generation via Masked Generative Transformerscited by 648
  8. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
  9. 2018nocaps: novel object captioning at scalecited by 444
  10. 2023FastComposer: Tuning-Free Multi-Subject Image Generation with Localized Attentioncited by 313
  11. 2023T2I-CompBench++: An Enhanced and Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-image Generationcited by 260
  12. 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoningcited by 254
  13. 2020A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understandingcited by 108
  14. 2022Benchmarking Spatial Relationships in Text-to-Image Generationcited by 97
  15. 2023Compositional Abilities Emerge Multiplicatively: Exploring Diffusion Models on a Synthetic Taskcited by 93
  16. 2023FreeControl: Training-Free Spatial Control of Any Text-to-Image Diffusion Model with Any Conditioncited by 91
  17. 2023LLMScore: Unveiling the Power of Large Language Models in Text-to-Image Synthesis Evaluationcited by 87
  18. 2023Compositional Generalization from First Principlescited by 64
  19. 2022SceneComposer: Any-Level Semantic Image Synthesiscited by 43
  20. 2023Language Quantized AutoEncoders: Towards Unsupervised Text-Image Alignmentcited by 29
  21. 2021ReaSCAN: Compositional Reasoning in Language Groundingcited by 19
  22. 2021Compositional Processing Emerges in Neural Networks Solving Math Problemscited by 11
  23. 2022Training Vision-Language Transformers from Captionscited by 11
  24. 2023Compositional diversity in visual concept learningcited by 8
  25. 2022Compositional Generalisation with Structured Reordering and Fertility Layerscited by 6
  26. 2023Training Priors Predict Text-To-Image Model Performancecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5.

8 papers.