mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Monotonic Paraphrasing Improves Generalization of Language Model Prompting

arXiv 2403.16038 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2024cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Performance of large language models (LLMs) may vary with different prompts or instructions of even the same task. One commonly recognized factor for this phenomenon is the model's familiarity with the given prompt or instruction, which is typically estimated by its perplexity. However, finding the prompt with the lowest perplexity is challenging, given the enormous space of possible prompting phrases. In this paper, we propose monotonic paraphrasing (MonoPara), an end-to-end decoding strategy that paraphrases given prompts or instructions into their lower perplexity counterparts based on an ensemble of a paraphrase LM for prompt (or instruction) rewriting, and a target LM (i.e. the prompt or instruction executor) that constrains the generation for lower perplexity. The ensemble decoding process can efficiently paraphrase the original prompt without altering its semantic meaning, while monotonically decreasing the perplexity of each generation as calculated by the target LM. We explore in detail both greedy and search-based decoding as two alternative decoding schemes of MonoPara. Notably, MonoPara does not require any training and can monotonically lower the perplexity of the paraphrased prompt or instruction, leading to improved performance of zero-shot LM prompting as evaluated on a wide selection of tasks. In addition, MonoPara is also shown to effectively improve LMs' generalization on perturbed and unseen task instructions.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2024.

Builds on

53 of 79 references.

References · 53

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  6. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  7. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  8. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  9. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  10. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  11. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  12. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
38 more
  1. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  2. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  3. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  4. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
  5. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,122
  6. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
  7. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  8. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
  9. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
  10. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 712
  11. 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 668
  12. 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 663
  13. 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 598
  14. 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 414
  15. 2022RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learningcited by 361
  16. 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
  17. 2021Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?cited by 324
  18. 2018Adversarial Example Generation with Syntactically Controlled Paraphrase Networkscited by 282
  19. 2022Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimationcited by 215
  20. 2021NeuroLogic A*esque Decoding: Constrained Text Generation with Lookahead Heuristicscited by 153
  21. 2021OpenPrompt: An Open-source Framework for Prompt-learningcited by 148
  22. 2023Automatic Prompt Augmentation and Selection with Chain-of-Thought from Labeled Datacited by 119
  23. 2017Paraphrase Generation with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
  24. 2020Neural Syntactic Preordering for Controlled Paraphrase Generationcited by 56
  25. 2017A Deep Generative Framework for Paraphrase Generationcited by 54
  26. 2020Syntax-guided Controlled Generation of Paraphrasescited by 47
  27. 2019Controllable Paraphrase Generation with a Syntactic Exemplarcited by 44
  28. 2017Diversity driven Attention Model for Query-based Abstractive Summarizationcited by 42
  29. 2022Controllable Text Generation with Neurally-Decomposed Oraclecited by 41
  30. 2019Decomposable Neural Paraphrase Generationcited by 30
  31. 2022Novelty Controlled Paraphrase Generation with Retrieval Augmented Conditional Prompt Tuningcited by 25
  32. 2021Factorising Meaning and Form for Intent-Preserving Paraphrasingcited by 22
  33. 2023In-Context Demonstration Selection with Cross Entropy Differencecited by 17
  34. 2024Contrastive Instruction Tuningcited by 17
  35. 2018Multi-Source Social Feedback of Online News Feedscited by 14
  36. 2021ConRPG: Paraphrase Generation using Contexts as Regularizercited by 13
  37. 2023Explanation Selection Using Unlabeled Data for Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 12
  38. 2023CTQScorer: Combining Multiple Features for In-context Example Selection for Machine Translationcited by 12

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

10 papers.