mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

One Surrogate to Fool Them All: Universal, Transferable, and Targeted Adversarial Attacks with CLIP

arXiv 2505.19840 ↗First posted 26 May 2025cs.CR cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have achieved widespread success yet remain prone to adversarial attacks. Typically, such attacks either involve frequent queries to the target model or rely on surrogate models closely mirroring the target model -- often trained with subsets of the target model's training data -- to achieve high attack success rates through transferability. However, in realistic scenarios where training data is inaccessible and excessive queries can raise alarms, crafting adversarial examples becomes more challenging. In this paper, we present UnivIntruder, a novel attack framework that relies solely on a single, publicly available CLIP model and publicly available datasets. By using textual concepts, UnivIntruder generates universal, transferable, and targeted adversarial perturbations that mislead DNNs into misclassifying inputs into adversary-specified classes defined by textual concepts. Our extensive experiments show that our approach achieves an Attack Success Rate (ASR) of up to 85% on ImageNet and over 99% on CIFAR-10, significantly outperforming existing transfer-based methods. Additionally, we reveal real-world vulnerabilities, showing that even without querying target models, UnivIntruder compromises image search engines like Google and Baidu with ASR rates up to 84%, and vision language models like GPT-4 and Claude-3.5 with ASR rates up to 80%. These findings underscore the practicality of our attack in scenarios where traditional avenues are blocked, highlighting the need to reevaluate security paradigms in AI applications.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.

Builds on

44 of 82 references.

References · 44

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  5. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  7. 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them Allcited by 1,175
  8. 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 666
  9. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  10. 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 536
  11. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
  12. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
32 more
  1. 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 328
  2. 2023Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?cited by 315
  3. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 278
  4. 2023How Robust is Google's Bard to Adversarial Image Attacks?cited by 183
  5. 2020Adversarial Robustness: From Self-Supervised Pre-Training to Fine-Tuningcited by 153
  6. 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
  7. 2023Abusing Images and Sounds for Indirect Instruction Injection in Multi-Modal LLMscited by 124
  8. 2022Narcissus: A Practical Clean-Label Backdoor Attack with Limited Informationcited by 103
  9. 2020On Success and Simplicity: A Second Look at Transferable Targeted Attackscited by 89
  10. 2023Revisiting Adversarial Training for ImageNet: Architectures, Training and Generalization across Threat Modelscited by 79
  11. 2023How Deep Learning Sees the World: A Survey on Adversarial Attacks & Defensescited by 66
  12. 2021On Generating Transferable Targeted Perturbationscited by 65
  13. 2022When Adversarial Training Meets Vision Transformers: Recipes from Training to Architecturecited by 64
  14. 2023Robust Principles: Architectural Design Principles for Adversarially Robust CNNscited by 46
  15. 2023Exploring and Exploiting Decision Boundary Dynamics for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 36
  16. 2020Practical No-box Adversarial Attacks against DNNscited by 32
  17. 2022Physical Backdoor Attacks to Lane Detection Systems in Autonomous Drivingcited by 31
  18. 2024Universal Adversarial Perturbations for Vision-Language Pre-trained Modelscited by 31
  19. 2023Adversarial Illusions in Multi-Modal Embeddingscited by 29
  20. 2022Revisiting Residual Networks for Adversarial Robustness: An Architectural Perspectivecited by 28
  21. 2019Regional Homogeneity: Towards Learning Transferable Universal Adversarial Perturbations Against Defensescited by 23
  22. 2023BlackboxBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Black-box Adversarial Attackscited by 21
  23. 2024MeanSparse: Post-Training Robustness Enhancement Through Mean-Centered Feature Sparsificationcited by 21
  24. 2023Improving the Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off of Classifiers via Adaptive Smoothingcited by 18
  25. 2023Logit Margin Matters: Improving Transferable Targeted Adversarial Attack by Logit Calibrationcited by 18
  26. 2024MixedNUTS: Training-Free Accuracy-Robustness Balance via Nonlinearly Mixed Classifierscited by 16
  27. 2019Simple iterative method for generating targeted universal adversarial perturbationscited by 14
  28. 2023Comparing the Robustness of Modern No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics to Adversarial Attackscited by 14
  29. 2024Enhancing targeted transferability via feature space fine-tuningcited by 7
  30. 2024Robust Overfitting Does Matter: Test-Time Adversarial Purification With FGSMcited by 6
  31. 2024Interpretability-Guided Test-Time Adversarial Defensecited by 3
  32. 2023Boosting Decision-Based Black-Box Adversarial Attack with Gradient Priorscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 11.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023MF-CLIP: Leveraging CLIP as Surrogate Models for No-box Adversarial Attacks
  2. 2025X-Transfer Attacks: Towards Super Transferable Adversarial Attacks on CLIP
  3. 2026Improving Adversarial Transferability on Vision-Language Pre-training Models via Surrogate-Specific Bias Correction
  4. 2025Bridging the Task Gap: Multi-Task Adversarial Transferability in CLIP and Its Derivatives
  5. 2023Learning the Unlearnable: Adversarial Augmentations Suppress Unlearnable Example Attacks
  6. 2025Unleashing the Power of Pre-trained Encoders for Universal Adversarial Attack Detection
  7. 2024Adversarial Backdoor Defense in CLIP
  8. 2025Diversifying Counterattacks: Orthogonal Exploration for Robust CLIP Inference