mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking the Robustness of UAV Tracking Against Common Corruptions

arXiv 2403.11424 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2024cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The robustness of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) tracking is crucial in many tasks like surveillance and robotics. Despite its importance, little attention is paid to the performance of UAV trackers under common corruptions due to lack of a dedicated platform. Addressing this, we propose UAV-C, a large-scale benchmark for assessing robustness of UAV trackers under common corruptions. Specifically, UAV-C is built upon two popular UAV datasets by introducing 18 common corruptions from 4 representative categories including adversarial, sensor, blur, and composite corruptions in different levels. Finally, UAV-C contains more than 10K sequences. To understand the robustness of existing UAV trackers against corruptions, we extensively evaluate 12 representative algorithms on UAV-C. Our study reveals several key findings: 1) Current trackers are vulnerable to corruptions, indicating more attention needed in enhancing the robustness of UAV trackers; 2) When accompanying together, composite corruptions result in more severe degradation to trackers; and 3) While each tracker has its unique performance profile, some trackers may be more sensitive to specific corruptions. By releasing UAV-C, we hope it, along with comprehensive analysis, serves as a valuable resource for advancing the robustness of UAV tracking against corruption. Our UAV-C will be available at https://github.com/Xiaoqiong-Liu/UAV-C.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.

Builds on

24 of 31 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  4. 2019Towards Robust Monocular Depth Estimation: Mixing Datasets for Zero-shot Cross-dataset Transfercited by 1,484
  5. 2018SiamRPN++: Evolution of Siamese Visual Tracking with Very Deep Networkscited by 445
  6. 2021Transformer Trackingcited by 412
  7. 2021Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Trackingcited by 348
  8. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
  9. 2022Joint Feature Learning and Relation Modeling for Tracking: A One-Stream Frameworkcited by 328
  10. 2020Detection and Tracking Meet Drones Challengecited by 261
  11. 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
  12. 2018The Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Benchmark: Object Detection and Trackingcited by 207
12 more
  1. 2020Siamese Box Adaptive Network for Visual Trackingcited by 189
  2. 2021Learning Target Candidate Association to Keep Track of What Not to Trackcited by 131
  3. 2022Transforming Model Prediction for Trackingcited by 117
  4. 2019Benchmarking the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 111
  5. 2021HiFT: Hierarchical Feature Transformer for Aerial Trackingcited by 72
  6. 2022TCTrack: Temporal Contexts for Aerial Trackingcited by 69
  7. 2020AutoTrack: Towards High-Performance Visual Tracking for UAV with Automatic Spatio-Temporal Regularizationcited by 62
  8. 2021SiamAPN++: Siamese Attentional Aggregation Network for Real-Time UAV Trackingcited by 38
  9. 2023SGDViT: Saliency-Guided Dynamic Vision Transformer for UAV Trackingcited by 20
  10. 2020Multi-Drone based Single Object Tracking with Agent Sharing Networkcited by 14
  11. 2022Siamese Object Tracking for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: A Review and Comprehensive Analysiscited by 11
  12. 2023Nordic Vehicle Dataset (NVD): Performance of vehicle detectors using newly captured NVD from UAV in different snowy weather conditionscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.