mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TestifAI: Tomography-Based Testing for Deep Learning Systems

arXiv 2608.18900 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI systems are increasingly deployed in safety-critical application domains (e.g., autonomous driving), associated risks increase too. Deep learning models underlying modern AI systems, therefore, must undergo thorough testing to ensure their correct behaviour. A single robustness test involves thousands of inferences to empirically verify if a model's outputs remain stable under a bounded perturbation of its inputs. However, existing testing frameworks lack the means to systematically explore and summarise robustness across a combinatorial space of perturbations. We propose TestifAI, a deep learning testing framework for efficient and accurate estimation of robustness against combinations of perturbations. TestifAI enables users to specify operational conditions as structured spaces of semantic input perturbations (e.g., image blur, brightness and zoom) and discrete severity levels (e.g., low, medium and high). Users can query model robustness for any combination (e.g., "low blur, high brightness, and medium zoom"). To achieve efficiency and accuracy, TestifAI introduces partial model tomography, a novel approach to reconstructing model behaviour in a multi-perturbation space from tests that apply only a small number of perturbations (lower-order projections). To estimate robustness against at least three perturbations, TestifAI trains an auxiliary model on the results of tests involving up to two perturbations only, avoiding execution of an exponential number of tests. Our experiments on five image and language classification tasks show that TestifAI can predict higher-order (3 and 4 perturbations) test outcomes from low-order (1 and 2 perturbations) observations with an aggregate robustness estimation error of less than 7%, while reducing the number of inferences by 60-80%.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2026.

Builds on

43 of 81 references.

References · 43

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  5. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  6. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  7. 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,293
  8. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  9. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  10. 2023End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontierscited by 490
  11. 2020CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesiscited by 479
  12. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 311
31 more
  1. 2020Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognitioncited by 275
  2. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 251
  3. 2021Gradient-based Adversarial Attacks against Text Transformerscited by 234
  4. 2019Combating Adversarial Misspellings with Robust Word Recognitioncited by 163
  5. 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 147
  6. 2019MNIST-C: A Robustness Benchmark for Computer Visioncited by 138
  7. 2021PixMix: Dreamlike Pictures Comprehensively Improve Safety Measurescited by 131
  8. 2022ReCode: Robustness Evaluation of Code Generation Modelscited by 103
  9. 2021On Interaction Between Augmentations and Corruptions in Natural Corruption Robustnesscited by 97
  10. 2018DLFuzz: Differential Fuzzing Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 65
  11. 2020Adversarial Machine Learning in Image Classification: A Survey Towards the Defender's Perspectivecited by 59
  12. 2024Scalable Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-bound Inferred Cutting Planescited by 33
  13. 2017CURE-TSR: Challenging Unreal and Real Environments for Traffic Sign Recognitioncited by 32
  14. 2021Defending Against Image Corruptions Through Adversarial Augmentationscited by 28
  15. 2024Is Your HD Map Constructor Reliable under Sensor Corruptions?cited by 28
  16. 2019Test Selection for Deep Learning Systemscited by 27
  17. 2022Simple Techniques Work Surprisingly Well for Neural Network Test Prioritization and Active Learning (Replicability Study)cited by 27
  18. 2021Using Prior Knowledge to Guide BERT's Attention in Semantic Textual Matching Taskscited by 22
  19. 2022When and Why Test Generators for Deep Learning Produce Invalid Inputs: an Empirical Studycited by 18
  20. 2022CertiFair: A Framework for Certified Global Fairness of Neural Networkscited by 17
  21. 2022Efficient Global Robustness Certification of Neural Networks via Interleaving Twin-Network Encodingcited by 15
  22. 2017HotFlip: White-Box Adversarial Examples for Text Classificationcited by 13
  23. 2024Verification of Neural Networks' Global Robustnesscited by 10
  24. 2021Benchmarking the Robustness of Instance Segmentation Modelscited by 8
  25. 2023Revealing the Blind Spot of Sentence Encoder Evaluation by HEROScited by 5
  26. 2018Traffic Signs in the Wild: Highlights from the IEEE Video and Image Processing Cup 2017 Student Competition [SP Competitions]cited by 4
  27. 2019Automated Testing for Deep Learning Systems with Differential Behavior Criteriacited by 2
  28. 2024Benchmarking the Robustness of UAV Tracking Against Common Corruptionscited by 2
  29. 2023Design, implementation, and validation of a benchmark generator for combinatorial interaction testing toolscited by 1
  30. 2024Enhancing Deep Learning Model Robustness through Metamorphic Re-Trainingcited by 1
  31. 2025Coverage-Guided Testing for Deep Learning Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.