mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LabelAId: Just-in-time AI Interventions for Improving Human Labeling Quality and Domain Knowledge in Crowdsourcing Systems

arXiv 2403.09810 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2024cs.HC cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Crowdsourcing platforms have transformed distributed problem-solving, yet quality control remains a persistent challenge. Traditional quality control measures, such as prescreening workers and refining instructions, often focus solely on optimizing economic output. This paper explores just-in-time AI interventions to enhance both labeling quality and domain-specific knowledge among crowdworkers. We introduce LabelAId, an advanced inference model combining Programmatic Weak Supervision (PWS) with FT-Transformers to infer label correctness based on user behavior and domain knowledge. Our technical evaluation shows that our LabelAId pipeline consistently outperforms state-of-the-art ML baselines, improving mistake inference accuracy by 36.7% with 50 downstream samples. We then implemented LabelAId into Project Sidewalk, an open-source crowdsourcing platform for urban accessibility. A between-subjects study with 34 participants demonstrates that LabelAId significantly enhances label precision without compromising efficiency while also increasing labeler confidence. We discuss LabelAId's success factors, limitations, and its generalizability to other crowdsourced science domains.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2024.

Builds on

22 of 108 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  5. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
  6. 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 396
  7. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
  8. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  9. 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthycited by 182
  10. 2018On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detectioncited by 159
  11. 2020Proxy Tasks and Subjective Measures Can Be Misleading in Evaluating Explainable AI Systemscited by 138
  12. 2021To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingcited by 118
10 more
  1. 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
  2. 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
  3. 2022Transfer Learning with Deep Tabular Modelscited by 52
  4. 2017Wildbook: Crowdsourcing, computer vision, and data science for conservationcited by 20
  5. 2022Labeling instructions matter in biomedical image analysiscited by 20
  6. 2019Multi-Resolution Weak Supervision for Sequential Datacited by 17
  7. 2020Learning with Weak Supervision for Email Intent Detectioncited by 17
  8. 2022Understanding Programmatic Weak Supervision via Source-aware Influence Functioncited by 8
  9. 2021The Challenge of Variable Effort Crowdsourcing and How Visible Gold Can Helpcited by 6
  10. 2020Effects of Human vs. Automatic Feedback on Students' Understanding of AI Concepts and Programming Stylecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.