Verified Training for Counterfactual Explanation Robustness under Data Shift
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactual explanations (CEs) enhance the interpretability of machine learning models by describing what changes to an input are necessary to change its prediction to a desired class. These explanations are commonly used to guide users' actions, e.g., by describing how a user whose loan application was denied can be approved for a loan in the future. Existing approaches generate CEs by focusing on a single, fixed model, and do not provide any formal guarantees on the CEs' future validity. When models are updated periodically to account for data shift, if the generated CEs are not robust to the shifts, users' actions may no longer have the desired impacts on their predictions. This paper introduces VeriTraCER, an approach that jointly trains a classifier and an explainer to explicitly consider the robustness of the generated CEs to small model shifts. VeriTraCER optimizes over a carefully designed loss function that ensures the verifiable robustness of CEs to local model updates, thus providing deterministic guarantees to CE validity. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that VeriTraCER generates CEs that (1) are verifiably robust to small model updates and (2) display competitive robustness to state-of-the-art approaches in handling empirical model updates including random initialization, leave-one-out, and distribution shifts.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2024.
Builds on
30 of 38 references.
References · 30
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 496
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
- 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
- 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 328
- 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 328
- 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 233
- 2019Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypescited by 223
18 more
- 2019Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 205
- 2019Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Consequential Decisionscited by 204
- 2019Predictive Multiplicity in Classificationcited by 166
- 2019Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulationcited by 112
- 2021Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 102
- 2020On Counterfactual Explanations under Predictive Multiplicitycited by 74
- 2020Fairwashing Explanations with Off-Manifold Detergentcited by 72
- 2022Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Tree-Based Ensemblescited by 49
- 2023Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networks With Probabilistic Guaranteescited by 45
- 2020Towards Robust Explanations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 43
- 2021Consistent Counterfactuals for Deep Modelscited by 37
- 2022Formalising the Robustness of Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networkscited by 24
- 2022Counterfactual Plans under Distributional Ambiguitycited by 19
- 2022Efficiently Training Low-Curvature Neural Networkscited by 19
- 2021Certified Robustness to Programmable Transformations in LSTMscited by 18
- 2021CounterNet: End-to-End Training of Prediction Aware Counterfactual Explanationscited by 17
- 2023Distributionally Robust Recourse Actioncited by 12
- 2023On Minimizing the Impact of Dataset Shifts on Actionable Explanationscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.