Enhancing Data Provenance and Model Transparency in Federated Learning Systems -- A Database Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) presents a promising paradigm for training machine learning models across decentralized edge devices while preserving data privacy. Ensuring the integrity and traceability of data across these distributed environments, however, remains a critical challenge. The ability to create transparent artificial intelligence, such as detailing the training process of a machine learning model, has become an increasingly prominent concern due to the large number of sensitive (hyper)parameters it utilizes; thus, it is imperative to strike a reasonable balance between openness and the need to protect sensitive information. In this paper, we propose one of the first approaches to enhance data provenance and model transparency in federated learning systems. Our methodology leverages a combination of cryptographic techniques and efficient model management to track the transformation of data throughout the FL process, and seeks to increase the reproducibility and trustworthiness of a trained FL model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through experimental evaluations on diverse FL scenarios, showcasing its ability to tackle accountability and explainability across the board. Our findings show that our system can greatly enhance data transparency in various FL environments by storing chained cryptographic hashes and client model snapshots in our proposed design for data decoupled FL. This is made possible by also employing multiple optimization techniques which enables comprehensive data provenance without imposing substantial computational loads. Extensive experimental results suggest that integrating a database subsystem into federated learning systems can improve data provenance in an efficient manner, encouraging secure FL adoption in privacy-sensitive applications and paving the way for future advancements in FL transparency and security features.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2024.
Builds on
20 of 44 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
- 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 565
- 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 326
8 more
- 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 320
- 2019SecureBoost: A Lossless Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 174
- 2017CryptoDL: Deep Neural Networks over Encrypted Datacited by 56
- 2022BlindFL: Vertical Federated Machine Learning without Peeking into Your Datacited by 36
- 2023Practical Differentially Private and Byzantine-resilient Federated Learningcited by 18
- 2020TRACER: A Framework for Facilitating Accurate and Interpretable Analytics for High Stakes Applicationscited by 13
- 2021Enabling SQL-based Training Data Debugging for Federated Learningcited by 8
- 2020Differentially Private ADMM Algorithms for Machine Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.