mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Spurious Feature Eraser: Stabilizing Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Foundation Model

arXiv 2403.00376 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language foundation models have exhibited remarkable success across a multitude of downstream tasks due to their scalability on extensive image-text paired data. However, these models also display significant limitations when applied to downstream tasks, such as fine-grained image classification, as a result of ``decision shortcuts'' that hinder their generalization capabilities. In this work, we find that the CLIP model possesses a rich set of features, encompassing both textitdesired invariant causal features and textitundesired decision shortcuts. Moreover, the underperformance of CLIP on downstream tasks originates from its inability to effectively utilize pre-trained features in accordance with specific task requirements. To address this challenge, we propose a simple yet effective method, Spurious Feature Eraser (SEraser), to alleviate the decision shortcuts by erasing the spurious features. Specifically, we introduce a test-time prompt tuning paradigm that optimizes a learnable prompt, thereby compelling the model to exploit invariant features while disregarding decision shortcuts during the inference phase. The proposed method effectively alleviates excessive dependence on potentially misleading spurious information. We conduct comparative analysis of the proposed method against various approaches which validates the significant superiority.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 34 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2024.

Builds on

34 of 43 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Align Your Prompts: Test-Time Prompting with Distribution Alignment for Zero-Shot Generalization2 Nov
  2. 2023What does CLIP know about a red circle? Visual prompt engineering for VLMs13 Apr
  3. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models15 Sep
  4. 2022Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuning30 May

Other references · 30

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  3. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  4. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  5. 2021Grounded Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 1,147
  6. 2021StyleCLIP: Text-Driven Manipulation of StyleGAN Imagerycited by 990
  7. 2021Open-vocabulary Object Detection via Vision and Language Knowledge Distillationcited by 903
  8. 2021MDETR -- Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understandingcited by 811
  9. 2022Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Mask-adapted CLIPcited by 560
  10. 2023ELITE: Encoding Visual Concepts into Textual Embeddings for Customized Text-to-Image Generationcited by 414
  11. 2023Open-Vocabulary Panoptic Segmentation with Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 371
  12. 2023Track Anything: Segment Anything Meets Videoscited by 230
18 more
  1. 2023Improving CLIP Training with Language Rewritescited by 216
  2. 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
  3. 2022Trusted Multi-View Classification with Dynamic Evidential Fusioncited by 167
  4. 2023Alpha-CLIP: A CLIP Model Focusing on Wherever You Wantcited by 150
  5. 2023Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Promptscited by 147
  6. 2021Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and Downstream Implicationscited by 128
  7. 2023SAM-CLIP: Merging Vision Foundation Models towards Semantic and Spatial Understandingcited by 111
  8. 2023AdvCLIP: Downstream-agnostic Adversarial Examples in Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 101
  9. 2023TinyCLIP: CLIP Distillation via Affinity Mimicking and Weight Inheritancecited by 90
  10. 2022A Whac-A-Mole Dilemma: Shortcuts Come in Multiples Where Mitigating One Amplifies Otherscited by 85
  11. 2023Fine-Grained Visual Promptingcited by 81
  12. 2022CLIP-Art: Contrastive Pre-training for Fine-Grained Art Classificationcited by 65
  13. 2019Self-supervised Domain Adaptation for Computer Vision Taskscited by 58
  14. 2023OvarNet: Towards Open-vocabulary Object Attribute Recognitioncited by 43
  15. 2023ID-like Prompt Learning for Few-Shot Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 42
  16. 2023Zero-Shot Robustification of Zero-Shot Modelscited by 24
  17. 2023DisCo-CLIP: A Distributed Contrastive Loss for Memory Efficient CLIP Trainingcited by 15
  18. 2023CLIP-guided Federated Learning on Heterogeneous and Long-Tailed Datacited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Towards Fine-Grained Robustness: Attention-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  2. 2024In-context Prompt Learning for Test-time Vision Recognition with Frozen Vision-language Model
  3. 2025MetaTPT: Meta Test-time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Doubly Debiased Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2022Learning to Decompose Visual Features with Latent Textual Prompts
  6. 2025Prompting without Panic: Attribute-aware, Zero-shot, Test-Time Calibration
  7. 2025Prompt-OT: An Optimal Transport Regularization Paradigm for Knowledge Preservation in Vision-Language Model Adaptation
  8. 2025MINT: Memory-Infused Prompt Tuning at Test-time for CLIP