BiPrompt: Bilateral Prompt Optimization for Visual and Textual Debiasing in Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision language foundation models such as CLIP exhibit impressive zero-shot generalization yet remain vulnerable to spurious correlations across visual and textual modalities. Existing debiasing approaches often address a single modality either visual or textual leading to partial robustness and unstable adaptation under distribution shifts. We propose a bilateral prompt optimization framework (BiPrompt) that simultaneously mitigates non-causal feature reliance in both modalities during test-time adaptation. On the visual side, it employs structured attention-guided erasure to suppress background activations and enforce orthogonal prediction consistency between causal and spurious regions. On the textual side, it introduces balanced prompt normalization, a learnable re-centering mechanism that aligns class embeddings toward an isotropic semantic space. Together, these modules jointly minimize conditional mutual information between spurious cues and predictions, steering the model toward causal, domain invariant reasoning without retraining or domain supervision. Extensive evaluations on real-world and synthetic bias benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in both average and worst-group accuracies over prior test-time debiasing methods, establishing a lightweight yet effective path toward trustworthy and causally grounded vision-language adaptation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 9 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2026.
Builds on
9 of 14 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Spurious Feature Eraser: Stabilizing Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Foundation Model1 Mar
- 2023What does CLIP know about a red circle? Visual prompt engineering for VLMs13 Apr
Other references · 7
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2022Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Mask-adapted CLIPcited by 560
- 2023Improving CLIP Training with Language Rewritescited by 216
- 2023Alpha-CLIP: A CLIP Model Focusing on Wherever You Wantcited by 150
- 2023Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Promptscited by 147
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Constrained Prompt Enhancement for Improving Zero-Shot Generalization of Vision-Language Models
- 2025AmPLe: Supporting Vision-Language Models via Adaptive-Debiased Ensemble Multi-Prompt Learning
- 2024Debiasing Vison-Language Models with Text-Only Training
- 2025Doubly Debiased Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
- 2024Aggregate-and-Adapt Natural Language Prompts for Downstream Generalization of CLIP
- 2025Attention Debiasing for Token Pruning in Vision Language Models
- 2025Prompt-OT: An Optimal Transport Regularization Paradigm for Knowledge Preservation in Vision-Language Model Adaptation
- 2026Robustifying Vision-Language Models via Test-Time Prompt Adaptation