Fairness-Aware Test-Time Prompt Tuning
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language models have displayed remarkable capabilities in multi-modal understanding and are increasingly used in critical applications where economic and practical deployment constraints prohibit re-training or fine-tuning. However, these models can also exhibit systematic biases that disproportionately affect protected demographic groups and existing approaches to addressing these biases require extensive model retraining and access to demographic attributes. There is a clear need to develop test-time adaptation (TTA) approaches that improve the fairness characteristics of pretrained models under distributional shift. In this paper, we evaluate how episodic TTA affects fairness in CLIP classification under subpopulation shifts and develop FairTPT, a novel fairness-aware episodic TTA method that jointly minimizes target marginal entropy while maximizing spurious marginal entropy through soft-prompt tuning. We find that standard episodic TTA generally exacerbates disparities between majority and minority groups, that blinding a model to spurious attributes without degrading target performance is inherently challenging, and that excessive blinding can lead to catastrophic forgetting. This model collapse can be prevented by monitoring test-time changes in target loss within the linear regime, while still achieving fairness improvements on reactive data and preserving overall performance. FairTPT outperforms all state-of-the-art episodic test-time debiasing methods and establishes a foundation for robust TTA, which is essential for achieving fairness in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 46 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.
Builds on
46 of 51 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025The Illusion of Progress? A Critical Look at Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models30 Jun
- 2024Spurious Feature Eraser: Stabilizing Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Foundation Model1 Mar
- 2023PerceptionCLIP: Visual Classification by Inferring and Conditioning on Contexts2 Aug
- 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models15 Sep
- 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep
Other references · 40
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
- 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
28 more
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
- 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 327
- 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
- 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 151
- 2023Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Promptscited by 149
- 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
- 2021Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and Downstream Implicationscited by 128
- 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
- 2022A Prompt Array Keeps the Bias Away: Debiasing Vision-Language Models with Adversarial Learningcited by 104
- 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
- 2021Are Gender-Neutral Queries Really Gender-Neutral? Mitigating Gender Bias in Image Searchcited by 90
- 2023DeAR: Debiasing Vision-Language Models with Additive Residualscited by 70
- 2023On Pitfalls of Test-Time Adaptationcited by 64
- 2022Contrastive Adapters for Foundation Model Group Robustnesscited by 62
- 2022Confidence Score for Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 59
- 2024Beyond Model Adaptation at Test Time: A Surveycited by 59
- 2022Balancing Discriminability and Transferability for Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 58
- 2019Mitigating Information Leakage in Image Representations: A Maximum Entropy Approachcited by 48
- 2023Vision-Language Models Performing Zero-Shot Tasks Exhibit Gender-based Disparitiescited by 31
- 2022TeST: Test-time Self-Training under Distribution Shiftcited by 29
- 2024Identifying Implicit Social Biases in Vision-Language Modelscited by 27
- 2023Zero-Shot Robustification of Zero-Shot Modelscited by 24
- 2024Demographic Bias of Expert-Level Vision-Language Foundation Models in Medical Imagingcited by 24
- 2024Protected Test-Time Adaptation via Online Entropy Matching: A Betting Approachcited by 23
- 2024Jacobian Descent for Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 18
- 2024BendVLM: Test-Time Debiasing of Vision-Language Embeddingscited by 17
- 2025Monitoring Risks in Test-Time Adaptationcited by 11
- 2025Vision-Language Models display a strong gender biascited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Selective Test-Time Debiasing for CLIP via Reward Gating
- 2026Fair Context Learning for Evidence-Balanced Test-Time Adaptation in Vision-Language Models
- 2024DOTA: Distributional Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
- 2024Evaluating Fairness in Large Vision-Language Models Across Diverse Demographic Attributes and Prompts
- 2024On Fairness of Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Models
- 2024Frustratingly Easy Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
- 2026Diversity Matters: Revisiting Test-Time Compute in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Benchmarking Bias Mitigation Toward Fairness Without Harm from Vision to LVLMs