Robust Guidance for Unsupervised Data Selection: Capturing Perplexing Named Entities for Domain-Specific Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Low-resourced data presents a significant challenge for neural machine translation. In most cases, the low-resourced environment is caused by high costs due to the need for domain experts or the lack of language experts. Therefore, identifying the most training-efficient data within an unsupervised setting emerges as a practical strategy. Recent research suggests that such effective data can be identified by selecting 'appropriately complex data' based on its volume, providing strong intuition for unsupervised data selection. However, we have discovered that establishing criteria for unsupervised data selection remains a challenge, as the 'appropriate level of difficulty' may vary depending on the data domain. We introduce a novel unsupervised data selection method named 'Capturing Perplexing Named Entities,' which leverages the maximum inference entropy in translated named entities as a metric for selection. When tested with the 'Korean-English Parallel Corpus of Specialized Domains,' our method served as robust guidance for identifying training-efficient data across different domains, in contrast to existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Feb 2024.
Builds on
27 of 41 references.
References · 27
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
- 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 621
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
15 more
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
- 2019Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 246
- 2022In-context Examples Selection for Machine Translationcited by 172
- 2021The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 161
- 2021Few-NERD: A Few-Shot Named Entity Recognition Datasetcited by 150
- 2022Understanding Transformer Memorization Recall Through Idiomscited by 62
- 2022Data Scaling Laws in NMT: The Effect of Noise and Architecturecited by 55
- 2021The Low-Resource Double Bind: An Empirical Study of Pruning for Low-Resource Machine Translationcited by 46
- 2021Trivial or impossible -- dichotomous data difficulty masks model differences (on ImageNet and beyond)cited by 35
- 2018Active Learning for Interactive Neural Machine Translation of Data Streamscited by 20
- 2018Back-Translation Sampling by Targeting Difficult Words in Neural Machine Translationcited by 19
- 2021Uncertainty-Aware Balancing for Multilingual and Multi-Domain Neural Machine Translation Trainingcited by 19
- 2021Self-Training Sampling with Monolingual Data Uncertainty for Neural Machine Translationcited by 17
- 2020Selecting Backtranslated Data from Multiple Sources for Improved Neural Machine Translationcited by 7
- 2023Improving the Quality of Neural Machine Translation Through Proper Translation of Name Entitiescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.