mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Back-Translation Sampling by Targeting Difficult Words in Neural Machine Translation

arXiv 1808.09006 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2018cs.CLcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural Machine Translation has achieved state-of-the-art performance for several language pairs using a combination of parallel and synthetic data. Synthetic data is often generated by back-translating sentences randomly sampled from monolingual data using a reverse translation model. While back-translation has been shown to be very effective in many cases, it is not entirely clear why. In this work, we explore different aspects of back-translation, and show that words with high prediction loss during training benefit most from the addition of synthetic data. We introduce several variations of sampling strategies targeting difficult-to-predict words using prediction losses and frequencies of words. In addition, we also target the contexts of difficult words and sample sentences that are similar in context. Experimental results for the WMT news translation task show that our method improves translation quality by up to 1.7 and 1.2 Bleu points over back-translation using random sampling for German-English and English-German, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 6; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Neural Machine Translation for Low-Resource Languages: A Surveycited by 108
  2. 2021Rejuvenating Low-Frequency Words: Making the Most of Parallel Data in Non-Autoregressive Translationcited by 34
  3. 2021Self-Training Sampling with Monolingual Data Uncertainty for Neural Machine Translationcited by 17
  4. 2021On the Complementarity between Pre-Training and Back-Translation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 14
  5. 2022Improving Simultaneous Machine Translation with Monolingual Datacited by 13
  6. 2021On the Language Coverage Bias for Neural Machine Translationcited by 12
  7. 2022Domain-Specific Text Generation for Machine Translationcited by 12
  8. 2021Exploiting Curriculum Learning in Unsupervised Neural Machine Translationcited by 6
  9. 2022Exploring Diversity in Back Translation for Low-Resource Machine Translationcited by 5
  10. 2022Scaling Back-Translation with Domain Text Generation for Sign Language Gloss Translationcited by 4
  11. 2023On Synthetic Data for Back Translationcited by 4
  12. 2024RAG-based Crowdsourcing Task Decomposition via Masked Contrastive Learning with Promptscited by 2
7 more
  1. 2022Can Synthetic Translations Improve Bitext Quality?cited by 1
  2. 2024Robust Guidance for Unsupervised Data Selection: Capturing Perplexing Named Entities for Domain-Specific Machine Translationcited by 1
  3. 2024From Priest to Doctor: Domain Adaptation for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 1
  4. 2022End-to-End Training for Back-Translation with Categorical Reparameterization Trickcited by 0
  5. 2024High-Quality Data Augmentation for Low-Resource NMT: Combining a Translation Memory, a GAN Generator, and Filteringcited by 0
  6. 2025From Scarcity to Efficiency: Investigating the Effects of Data Augmentation on African Machine Translationcited by 0
  7. 2025Contrastive Decoding for Synthetic Data Generation in Low-Resource Language Modelingcited by 0